Mohd. Ziaullah Khan v. Sri Kiran Kumar,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-19. Mohd. Ziaullah Khan v. Sri Kiran Kumar,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3302 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2755 OF 2025 Contempt Casb filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt. of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein wilful disobedience of the Orders of the High Court dated 19-11 -2024 passed in W. P. No. 963 of 2O22 Between: Mohd. Ziaullah Khan, S/o Late Nlchd. Momin Khan, aged about 73 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o H. No. 14-4-26, Mandi Bazar WarangalCity and District-506002. "'Petitioner AND Sri Kiran Kumar,, Tahsildar, Chennaraopet Mandal, Warangal Rural District. ... RespondenUcontemnor Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Shreyas Reddy Yalagiri : Gounsel for the Respondent : Smt S Sravanthi, AGP for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FI)R TITE STATE OF TELANGANA AT ITYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JIISTICE K. SARATH THE 19TlI DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 Between: Mohd.
Ziaullah Khan . Petitioner AND Sri Kiran Ku:mar, Tahsildar, Chennaraope:t Mandal, Warangal Rural District. "'ResPondent ORDER: Heard liri shreyas Reddy yalagiri, rearned counsel for the petitioner €rnrl Smt. S. sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Re''renue. perused the material on record. \ I 2' Learned Assistant Government preader for Revenr-le submits that, in pursuance of the orders of this court dated Lg. rr. 2o24 I I passed in w. l?. No. 963 of 2022, the respondent authority has conducted a ,le novo enqurry and issued proceedings dated 2L. lo-2o25 in Rc. No. B/ lgo/2o2s. In view of the s€une, the cause no longer survives lbr adjudication and. no further orders are required to be passed in this matter. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner did not . '. dispute the order dated 2L. Lo. 2o25 passed by respondent authoritJr, but seeks liberty for the petitioner to challenge the same. 4.
In view of the above submissions made by both sides, this contempt case is closed, granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings dated 2t. lo. 2o2s in Rc. No. B/ Lgo/2o2s issued by the respondent authority in appropriate proceedings. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shalr stand closed. sd/. v, ___ KAVTTHA DEPUTY REGISTRAR 6 //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Two I 2. One 3. Two #P,3,,':xffiIr ff s-'J,. ,. 3J*"iilff ,oUrt Sa/PSL 3;l;3i'"rangana I I HIGH COURT DATED:19l12l20}s -illE {, i) . ) ( 5 [[B 2fl2fi Lt 'tr * ORDER CC. No. 2755 of 2O? $ CLOSING THE CONTEMPT t ert
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.