INDIA SME ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU GP AND ORS
Court: Bombay High Court
Judgment date:
Case summary
Bombay High Court judgment dated 2026-08-20. INDIA SME ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU GP AND ORS. Read the judgment and...
Judgment text
906_WP9025_26. doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9025 OF 2026 India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. … Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and others … Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST. ) NO. 22988 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9025 OF 2026 --- Ms. Poonam Utekar i/b. A. G. Pandit & Associates for Petitioner. Mr. B. V. Samant, Additional GP a/w. Mr. S. P. Kamble, AGP for Respondents- State. Mr. Shrikant Misal, Resident Naib Tahsildar, Pune City (Respondent No. 3). Mrs. Ashvini Anil Satpute, Senior Inspector of Police, Bibwewadi Police Station, Pune City (Respondent No. 6). Mr. Nivas Maruti Shinde, Police Sub-Inspector, Bibwewadi Police Station, Pune City. CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026 P. C. : . When the petition is called out for hearing, Ms.
Utekar, learned counsel for the petitioner (secured creditor) informs this Court that finally, the directions of this Court have been complied with and that the officers of the respondent State took necessary steps as directed by this MINAL Digitally signed byMINAL SANDIP SANDIP PARAB Court. An affidavit of compliance is tendered on behalf of the petitioner. Date: 2026. 08. 20 PARAB 18:05:54 +0530 The same is taken on record. 2. The learned AGP has also tendered affidavits of the Police Sub- Inspector and the Senior Inspector of Police, Bibwewadi Police Station, Pune City as also Resident Naib Tahsildar, Pune City. The said officers 1/2 906_WP9025_26. doc are present in Court. In their affidavits, the officers have explained the circumstances in which prompt compliance of the directions issued by this Court could not be ensured. 3. We accept the explanations given in the said affidavits by the officers concerned. The affidavits are taken on record. 4.
In view of the above, nothing survives in this petition and it is disposed of accordingly. 5. In view of the order passed in the writ petition, Interim Application (St. ) No. 22988 of 2026 is also disposed of. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J. ) (MANISH PITALE, J. ) Minal Parab 2/2
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.