SOHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-06. SOHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:37610] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10284/2026 CNR: RJHC010782572026 | URN: CRLMB / 22529U / 2026 Sohan S/o Bheru Lal Jat, Aged About 84 Years, Resident Ofchhachheri, Police Station Hamirgarh District Bhilwara. At Present Lodged In District Jail, Bhilwara. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Dhaka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 06/08/2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties, and perused the material available on record. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 65/2026 of Police Station Kotwali Bhilwara, District Bhilwara, for the offences punishable under Sections 8/29 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged contraband 3.
840 kg poppy husk has not been recovered from the petitioner and the same was recovered from Lobha Ram which is below commercial quantity. It is stated that there is only one previous case registered against the petitioner way back in the year 2003 and the petitioner is of 84 years of age. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 27. 07. 2026 and the trial is likely to take considerable time to conclude. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:37610] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10284/2026] This Court has considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and finds that the alleged contraband 3. 840 kg poppy husk has not been recovered from the petitioner and the same was recovered from Lobha Ram which is below commercial quantity. Further, there is only one previous case registered against the petitioner under NDPS Act way back in the year 2003 and the petitioner is of 84 years of age.
The petitioner is in judicial custody since 27. 07. 2026. Hence, keeping in view of the fact that conclusion of the trial of the case is likely to take time. The recovered contrband is below commercial quantity and the prosecution has not shown any apprehension of the petitioner fleeing away from justice, in case he is enlarged on bail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is directed that petitioner – Sohan S/o Bheru Lal Jat, shall be released on bail in connection with aforesaid FIR, if not wanted in any other case, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.
50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J 64/Jatin Kumar
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.