LawSphereX

Datla Venkata Subba Lakshmi v. State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: K. SARATH

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-03. Datla Venkata Subba Lakshmi v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

I 3302 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECETUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 5173 OF 2022 Between: 45 years, Datla Venkata Subba Lakshmi, W/o Datla Venkata Narsimha Raju, Age_d gusiness, Post, Damarchala Ga. ' Rio Qtr No. F9/11, Vishnupuram, Vadepalli Mandal, Nalgonda Dist ... PETITIONER AND of 1. State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department Revenue, T. S. -secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. RR District 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, 4. The Tahsildar, serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ... RESPONDENTq Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the High Court may be circumstances state.

d in the affidavit filed therewith, the particularly one in pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction more the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3, 4 D and their sub-ordinates in interfering and trying to remove the fencing stones in respect of his Plot No. 115, admeasuring 300 Sq. yds in Sy. No. 36124, situated at phase ll, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally [Vlandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3,4 and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No. 115, admeasuring 300 Sq. yds, comprised in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase ll, ' ::-' -': ". Vinayak Nagar Reddy DistriJt, ;::,T#;; Manda,, :::? ,#,.

T:;,ff Ransa - r'-veoo ur raw ],,,nampa,,y and without issuing lANo:1 notice. oF 2022 petition pfayins the arrida,,, thar in o,llo,l, rhe circumsta ::rfi'; ,::" or the petition, stated in preased to oire""t"n""^":::i the n'nn High court ;;':'::ces mav be No'3 and pleased with the 4 and,n", oorr"r". 1. lu:::'o:" t'o-ordinates Petitioner not to interfere in 300 sq. yds, respect lhe or lt . ;:o^:,or u;,,"0 *easurins /24, corony, situated o,r",Jl, :l :;: T:d":rJ: :6 f ,l,' witho ut ro rrowin s d ue p rocess or,#'::: *,:, :}::, ;Tffi , H;:r',Jtng any :. ":{ notice. counset for the petitioner : sRr poRrt(A AetNeNoANA COUNSET I,ALA fOr thE RESPONdCNTS: ASST. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER a . ,. ',x. e IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JuSTICE K. SARATH IIIRIT PETITION No. 5173 of 2o22 Date: O3'd December 2O2S Between: Datla Venkata Subba Lakshmi ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep.

by its Principal Secretar5r, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & three others. ... Respondents ORDER: Heard Ms. Porika Abinandana Mala, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the action of a respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering with and attempting to remove the fencing stones in respect of petitioner's Plot No. 115, admeasuring 300 Sq. yards in Sy. No. 36/24, situated. at Phase II, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Viltage, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to d. ispossess the I ) I I n petitioner from her plot, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, as ilregal and arbitrary.

3' Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that while admitting the matter, this court passed interim order dated 07 'o2'2o22 wit]n a direction to maintain status quo existing as on that date until the next date of hearing in respect of the subject property. However, in spite of lapse of more than three and half years, the respondent authorities did not file a counter or a vacate petition denying the averments made by the petitioner in the writ affidavit. [n view of the szune, learned counsel requested this court to allow the Writ Petition by directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect to the subject property without following due process of law.

4' On the other hand, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner is'in possession of the subject property, the respondents will not interfere with the petitioner,s t possession of the subject property, without following due process of law and requested this court to pass appropriate orders. 5' In view of the submissions made on either side, this Writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in Plot No. 115, admeasuring 300 t* ao. rrtds in sy. No. 36 phase /24, situated at II, Vinayak Nagar colony, f\- Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due procedure of Iaw. There shall be no order as to costs 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/. M. NAGAMANI T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/ N OFFICER To, 1. The Prinicipal Secretary, Department of Revenue, T Telangana State, Hyderabad. 2.

The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. RR District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, 4. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 5. One CC to SRI PORTKA ABINANDANA N/IALA, Advocate. [oPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. lourl 7. Two CD Copies. BSK v GJP I \ HIGH COURT DATED:03/1 212025 S a (t r-) l) 0 6 JAN ? t? il ri. , rrl '/. '.. ORDER WP. No. 5173 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS I 0 \ .. 1

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.