Vadla Mallesham And Antoher v. The State of Telangana And 4 Others
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: A.ABHISHEK REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-07-13. Vadla Mallesham And Antoher v. The State of Telangana And 4 Others. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 10036 OF 2020 Between: 1. Vadla [t4allesham, S/o. Vadla Ramulu, Aged. 68 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H. No. 4-9-1 7 7, Alampally (Village), Vikarabad Mandal and District 2. Yadla Satya Narayana, S/o. Vadla Ramulu, Aged. 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H. No. 4-9-177, Alampally (Village), Vikarabad lvlandal and District ... Petitioners AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, Vikarabad District 3 The Joint Collector, Vikarabad District 4 TheTahsildar, Vikarabad Mandal and District 5 The St. Jude Church, Represented by its father Rev Fr. Charles, Vikarabad l\. 4andal and District ...
Respondents Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders or direction or writ more particularly in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3 in not passing any appropriate orders by conducting expeditious hearing and disposing of the Revision Petition No. F12624120 '19 filed by the petitioners on the file of the Respondent No,3, Under Section 24 of the A. P. (T. A) lnam Abolition Act, 1955, against the Respondents No. 4 and 5 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and null and void and consequently direct the Respondents No. 3 to pass any appropriate orders by conducting expeditious hearing and disposing of the Revision Petition No. F/2624l2019 in accordance with the procedure established by law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to not to dispossess the petitioners from possession and enjoyment of the land i. e. , the land bearing Sy. No. 241, admeasurrng Ac. 2-00 Gts and Sy. No. 242, admeasuring Ac. 1-27 Gts situated at Alampally Village, Vikarabad Mandal and Vikarabad District during pendency of the Revision Petition No. F 1262412019 filed by the petitioners on the file of the Respondent No. 3, against the Respondents No. 4 and 5 the pending of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. LAKSHMI MANOHAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No. 5:------ The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER q ? d THE H')N BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK RE DDY W. P. No.
10O36 of 2O2O ORDI}R: Heard the lcarned counsel lor the petitioners anrl the learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. V/ith their consent, the Wrrt Petition is disposed of at the stage of adrnission. The main grievance of the petitioners is that in spite of filing a revision belore the respondent No. 3-The Joint Ooll:ctor, on 17. O8. 2O19, tL e respondent No. 3 is not taking up lrr:aring of the revision and nr orders are passed thereon till date, rr spite of the lact that the unol'ficial responde nt in the revision ha; alr,:ad)' filed his counter in the revision in October, 20 19 itself. The learned Government Pleader, on instruction s, s -ates that due to administrative work exigencies and the, subsequent pandemic situation and the lockdown, the revision liled by the petitioner couLd not be disposcd of ancl seeks s:me time for disposing ol the Revision. ln view of the above submissions, the rvri' p,rrition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.
3-l'he . Joint Collector to pass necessary orders in Revir;;on Petition No. F 19 filed 12624 l20 by the petitioners, on meritr,;, strictly in accordance with law, after issuing notice to all the panies and aflording thenr aLn opportunity of hearing, as expr:ditiously as possible, prefe-ably within a period of four months frol the date of receipt of a copl' of this order. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand 'l'here closed. s:-rall be no order as to costs. SD/. I. NAGALAKSHMI ASS ISTANT REGI R ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal S;ecretary, Revenue Department, State of T,-. angana, Telangana Secretariat, Se if a bad, Hyderabad PTO 2. The District Collector, Vikarabad District 3. The Joint Collector, Vikarabad District 4. The Tahsildar, Vikarabad l\ilandal and District 5. One CC to Sri. K. Lakshmi Manohar, Advocate tOPUCI 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 7.
Two CD Copies Prk ,tlxV '{\- HIGH COURT DATED:13107 t2020 Afr; ORDER 6'-*. '$' WP. No. 1003€ of 2020 7 k'r4l' Disposing of the WP. at the stage of admission without costs. &t
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.