M/S JITENDRA KUMAR THAKUR, v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2025-01-10. M/S JITENDRA KUMAR THAKUR, v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Digitally signed 2025:CGHC:1710 by RAMESH NAFR KUMAR VATTI HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1513 of 2019 • M/s Jitendra Kumar Thakur, Through Proprietor - Jitendra Kumar Thakur S/o D. S. Thakur, Aged About 43 Years, Resident - Flat No. 203, Golden Ock, Green Garden Colony Mangla, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Agriculture And Biotechnology, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Vice - Chancellor, Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu University (C. G. K. V. ) Anjora, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 3. The Registrar, Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu University (C. G. K. V. ) Anjora, Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4. Executive Engineer, (Nirman Vibhag ) Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu University (C. G. K. V. ) Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None even in two round For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S. P. Kale, Add. Adv. Gen.
For Respondents No. 2 to 4 : Mr. Ashutosh Kachhawaha, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 10/01/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10. 1 This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to call for the records of the case pertaining to the petitioner from the respondents for its kind perusal. 10. 2 This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the lawfully due and admitted amount of final bill amounting to Rs. 59,39,837 (fifty nine lacs thirty nine thousand eight hundred thirty seven) in favour of the petitioner. 10. 3 This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the final bill amounting to Rs. 59,39,837 (fifty nine lacs thirty nine thousand eight hundred thirty seven) with 18% interest from 31 January 2018. 10. 4 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts & circumstances of case. ” 2.
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even in two rounds. 3. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti
Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.