Skip to main content
LawSphereX

SHRI THONGMINLAL THOMSONG AND 21 ORS v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS

Court: Gauhati High Court

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Judgment date:

Case summary

Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-02-14. SHRI THONGMINLAL THOMSONG AND 21 ORS v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

Page No. # 1/5 GAHC020000432024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/13/2024 SHRI THONGMINLAL THOMSONG AND 21 ORS PRESIDENT OF ALL NAGALAND HINDI STUDENTS UNION, RESIDENT OF PELLHANG PEREN DISTRICT- NAGALAND 2: SHRI. HAOGIN S/O KHUPLET R/O PELLHANG PEREN DISTRICT NAGALAND 3: SMTI. NZANO PATTON D/O Y. JOHN PATTON R/O WOKHA TOWN REPRESENTATIVES OF WOKHA DISTRICT WOKHA NAGALAND 4: SMTI. KHYOBENI JAMI D/O AYAMO JAMI R/O PWD COLONY REPRESENTATIVES OF WOKHA DISTRICT WOKHA NAGALAND 5: SMTI. P. SHONGNA KONYAK D/O PONJAI KONYAK R/O NAGINIMORA REPRESENTATIVES OF MON DISTRICT MON NAGALAND 6: SMTI. YINGLA KONYAK D/O LANGNYEI KONYAK R/O NAGINIMORA REPRESENTATIVES OF MON DISTRICT MON NAGALAND 7: SHRI. MONGKO YANCHU Y Page No. # 2/5 D/O YIMPOKKHUMBA R/O 3RD NAP COLONY REPRESENTATIVES OF TUENSANG DISTRICT TUENSANG NAGALAND 8: SMTI. T. AOCHILA D/O M.

WATI R/O HIGH SCHOOL A SIPHON COLONY REPRESENTATIVES OF TUENSANG DISTRICT TUENSANG NAGALAND 9: SMTI. NYAMSHAM PHOM D/O Z. LANHMAI PHOM R/OYONGAM VILLAGE REPRESENTATIVES OF LONGLENG DISTRICT LONGLENG NAGALAND 10: SHRI. E THETONG PHOM D/O P. ESHAU PHOM R/O LONGLENGY REPRESENTATIVES OF LONGLENG DISTRICT LONGLENG NAGALAND 11: SHRI. TIAWALA JAMIR D/O LIMA JAMIR R/O MOKOKCHUNG REPRESENTATIVES OF MOKOKCHUNG DISTRICT NAGALAND 12: SMTI. KATIMENLA D/O LT. SATEM AO R/O NAGA UNITED VILLAGE REPRESENTATIVES OF MOKOKCHUNG DISTRICT NAGALAND 13: SMTI. RUOKUOSENUO RUPREO D/O LAVITUOLIE RUPREO R/O SEPFUOLIE REPRESENTATIVES OF KOHIMA KOHIMA NAGALAND 14: SMTI. MARTHA MAGH D/O ZHUPITHONG MAGH R/O NEW COLONY WARD 9 CHUMU REPRESENTATIVES OF KOHIMA KOHIMA NAGALAND Page No. # 3/5 15: SMTI. ABOHOLI V D/O VIWOTO ZHIMOMIO R/O LAGHILATO REPRESENTATIVES OF ZUNHEBOTO DISTRICT NAGALAND 16: SHRI. COUNTO K. WOTSAMI D/O KHUHOVI R/O PADUMPUKHURI REPRESENTATIVES OF ZUNHEBOTO DISTRICT NAGALAND 17: SMTI. IMLISENLA AO D/O K.

AMONGBA AO R/O WARD 8 SEIURUZHA COLONY REPRESENTATIVES OF DIMAPUR DISTRICT NAGALAND 18: SMTI. LIPOKSENLA D/O RONGSENMEREN R/O WARD 6 CHURCH ROAD REPRESENTATIVES OF DIMAPUR DISTRICT NAGALAND 19: SHRI. EKATO S/O LOPENCHU R/OREGURI VILLAGE REPRESENTATIVES OF PHEK DISTRICT NAGALAND 20: SMTI. T. NEINCHONG D/O H. TEOE R/O AKHEWO VILLAGE M KHEL REPRESENTATIVES OF PHEL DISTRICT NAGALAND 21: SMTI. THSAPILA SANGTAM D/O LT. HOPONGSE SANGTAM R/O YINGPHIRE VILLAGE REPRESENTATIVES OF KIPHIRE DISTRICT NAGALAND 22: SMTI. KERILA YIMCHUNGER D/O KAMJIMONG YIMCHUNGER R/O LUTHUR VILLAGE REPRESENTATIVES OF KIPHIRE DISTRICT Page No. # 4/5 NAGALAN VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.

OF NAGALAND 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND DEPARTMENT OF P AND AR NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION NAGALAND KOHIMA 5:THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION (SHIKSHA MANTRALAYA) DEPT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION SHASTRI BHAWAN NEW DELH Advocate for the Petitioner : JOSHUA SHEQI Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 14-02-2024 (N. Sailo,J) Heard Ms. Mika H. Aye, learned counsel for the applicant who submits that by filing this application, the applicant seeks impleadment of the Director, Ministry of Page No. # 5/5 Education (Shiksha Mantralaya), Department of Higher Education, New Delhi, as respondent no. 5 in the connected writ petition, i. e. , WP(C)/123/2022.

The learned counsel submits that impleadment of the said party was in fact already permitted by this court by the order dated 22. 01. 2023 passed in the main writ petition. The learned counsel further submits that the Ministry of Education was earlier known as Ministry of Human Resource Development but the same has been renamed as Ministry of Education (Shiksha Mantralaya). The learned counsel submits that the impleadment of the said party is necessary for effective adjudication of the matter. In view of the above, the Director, Ministry of Education (Shiksha Mantralaya), Department of Higher Education, New Delhi is allowed to be impleaded as respondent no. 5. This IA stands disposed of as allowed. Sd/- Sd/- JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.