Skip to main content
LawSphereX

GULZAR MOHAMMAD v. RAMESH KUMAR, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU AND OTHERS

Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2024-12-27. GULZAR MOHAMMAD v. RAMESH KUMAR, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case...

Judgment text

Sr. No. 02 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP(S) No. 444/2019 Gulzar Mohammad …. Petitioner(s) Through :- Mr. Gagan Oswal, Advocate. V/s Ramesh Kumar, Deputy Commissioner, …. Respondent(s) Jammu and Ors. Through :- Ms. Aparna Gupta, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-1. Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI for R- 2 & 3. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 27. 12. 2024. 1. It has been brought to the notice of this Court by learned counsel for the respondents that in pursuant to order passed by this Court dated 08. 11. 2024, the respondent-Deputy Commissioner, Jammu has filed an affidavit today and copy of the same has been furnished to this Court which is taken on record. 2. As per the stand of the Deputy Commissioner, Jammu the invoice has already been raised on 06. 11. 2024 for payment of Rs.

1,88,38,842/- to the petitioner and the same has been forwarded to the Treasury and the copy of the same has been annexed alongwith the affidavit which is taken on record. 3. Thus, no fruitful purpose will be served to keep this contempt petition alive as the direction passed by this Court vide order/judgment dated 06. 05. 2009 stands complied with. 4. Accordingly, proceedings in the instant contempt petition stands closed. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged. 5. A direction is issued to the concerned Deputy Commissioner to release the aforesaid amount in favour of the rightful claimants including the petitioner and legal heirs of deceased- Haji Mohammad Hussain who have already been brought on record vide order dated 05. 10. 2024 subject to verification within a period of four weeks from today. 6.

However, the petitioner will be at liberty to revive the instant contempt petition in case the amount is not released in favour of the petitioners and the legal representatives of deceased-Haji Mohammad Hussain within a period of four weeks after due verification and in that eventuality, this Court will be constrained to take coercive measures against the respondents. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu: 27. 12. 2024. Neha-1 Neha Kumari 2024. 12. 30 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.