SMT K V SATHYAVATHI v. MR K V SRINIVAS
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: V SRISHANANDA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-12-09. SMT K V SATHYAVATHI v. MR K V SRINIVAS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CRP No. 594 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 594 OF 2024 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SMT K V SATHYAVATHI AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, W/O K N VADIRAJ RAO, R/O PADMASHREE NILAYA, HOSPITAL CIRCLE, DODDABALLAPUR - 561 203. 2. SMT SUJATHA S ACHARYA AGED 53 YEARS, W/O SRIKANTH ACHARYA, R/O NO. 967, PADMASHRI NILAYA, JC CIRCLE, DODDABALLAPURA - 561 203. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GANAPATHI BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR Digitally SRI. VENKATESH SOMAREDDI, ADVOCATE) signed by MALATESH AND: K C Location: 1. MR. K. V. SRINIVAS HIGH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, COURT OF S/O VADIRAJ RAO, KARNATAKA R/O SRI BHUVARAHA NILAYA, SOMESHWARA EXTENSION, DODDABALLAPURA - 561 203. - 2 - CRP No. 594 of 2024 2. MR KV GURURAJ RAO AGED 51 YEARS, S/O VADIRAJA RAO, R/O HAYAVADHANA NILAYA, TH SOMESHWARA EXTENSION, 4 WARD DODDABALLAPURA - 561 203. 3.
SMT INDIRA BHAT AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, D/O K N VADIRAJ RAO, W/O N K SEETHARAM BHATT, R/O ISWARYA NILAYA, BEHIND COURT COMPLEX, GOWRIBIDANUR - 561 208 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. S. K. NAGARATHNA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND 2) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC. 115 OF CPC. , AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18. 06. 2024 PASSED ON IA IN OS NO. 277/2015 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODDABALLAPURA. , DISMISSING THE IA FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC. , FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - CRP No. 594 of 2024 ORAL ORDER 1. Heard Sri. Ganapathi Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Nagarathna, learned counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2. 2. At the outset it is noted from the submission of counsel for petitioner Sri. Ganapathi Bhat that the suit itself has reached the stage of arguments on main matter. 3.
The challenge in the present revision petition is the rejection of the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 4. Taking note of the progress made in the suit, this Court is of the considered opinion that if the Trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit as early as possible would meet ends of justice. - 4 - CRP No. 594 of 2024 5. Accordingly, following order: ORDER (i) Civil Revision Petition stands disposed off. (ii) Order under revision stands confirmed. (iii) Trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit as early as possible, but not later than 31. 03. 2026. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No. : 1 Sl No. : 19 CT-SG
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.