DEEPAK KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Court: High Court of Uttarakhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ PUROHIT
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Uttarakhand judgment dated 2024-12-23. DEEPAK KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2024:UHC:9872 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Single No. 2324 of 2024 rd 23 December, 2024 Deepak Kumar …….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another ……Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Ms. Seema Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J. S. Bisht, S. C. for the State. Mr. B M Pingal, Advocate for Caveator/respondent no. 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has put to challenge the order dated 07. 11. 2024, whereby the petitioner was placed under suspension by the order of respondent no. 2- Managing Director, Uttarakhand State Co-operative Bank Ltd. , Haldwani. 2.
The petitioner was placed under suspension by the impugned order for the reason that in violation of Clause 6b and 8e of Lending Policy, whereby it is clearly prohibited that the Senior Officer of the Bank would not disburse the loan to his relatives without approval from the Board, the petitioner disbursed loan to his real brother. 3. The petitioner, who is Senior General Manager of the Bank allegedly sanctioned loan of ₹10,00,000/- to his real brother- Brijesh Kumar and the fund was diverted in his own account and the said amount was withdrawn on 24. 10. 2024, therefore, the petitioner was placed under suspension. 4. Clause 6b and 8e of the Lending Policy is quoted hereinbelow for ready reference:- “6b.
Restrictions on Grant of Loans & Advances to Officers and Relatives of Senior Officers of Banks Proposals for credit facilities to the relatives of senior officers 2024:UHC:9872 of the bank sanctioned by the appropriate authority will be reported in the Board when a credit facility is sanctioned by an authority, other than the Board. ” 8e. Delegation of Powers (i) The Board of Directors delegates specific powers to the officials, subcommittees at branches and subcommittee at the Head Office level in the matter of sanction of advances as detailed hereunder:- SI No. Authority Lending power (Rs. in lakh) 1 Chief Managers/Managers of branches up to Rs. 3. 00 lakh other than Haldwani Main Branch and Corporate Branch Dehradun 2 Chief Managers/Managers of Haldwani up to Rs. 5. 00 lakh Main Branch and Corporate Branch Dehradun 3 Sub-Committees for loans at “Garhwal up to Rs. 20. 00 lakh Mandal” and “Kumaon Mandal” The subcommittees constituting : will dispose of the loan 1.
Any one nominated Director, proposals relating to Chairman the branches of the respective mandals 2. GM/OSD, member above. The subcommittes will also 3. DGM (Credit), member be responsible for 4. Any one AGM, member making recommendation to HO 5. Branch Manager of concerned Loan Committee for branch, member-Convener disposal of the loan proposals above Rs. 20. 00 lakh. Saction letters pertaining to sanctions of Mandal sub Committees will be issued by Loan Department HO to the branch concernred. 4 Committee for loans at Head Office More than Rs. 20. 00 level constituting: lakh up to Rs. 1. 00 crore. 1. Chairman or Vice Chairman, Chairman HO Loan committee will dispose of the loan 2. Chairman or Vice Chairman, proposals within the Chairman limit prescribed above. The HO Loan 3. General Manager/OSD, member committee will also be 4. Dy.
General Manager, convener responsible for making 2024:UHC:9872 recommendation to Management Committee of Board for disposal of the loan proposals above Rs. 1. 00 crore. Sanction letters pertaining to sanctions of HO Loan Committee will be issued by Loan Department HO to the branch concerned after written orders from MD. 5 Management Committee of Board More than Rs. 1. 00 crore On receiving recommendations from HO Loan Committee the proposals will be considered within the consortium arrangement with the member DCSBs after receiving their consent. Sanction letter will only be issued by the loan department. HO only after written orders of the MD on receiving approval from the RCS, Uttarakhand. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, disputed the allegations made against the petitioner and submitted that the Board was not functioning and the information was already sent to the Managing Director, Loan Committee. 6.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having gone through Clause 6b and 8e of the Lending Policy, it is clear to the open eye that such loan cannot be permitted to be advanced by the petitioner and he is definitely made infraction of the aforesaid clauses in the lending policy by sanctioning loan to his own brother. 2024:UHC:9872 7. So far as non availability of the Board is concerned, it is informed that in the absence of the Board, Administrator has already been appointed by the Registrar, Co-operative Societies and the approval can very well be taken from Administrator, who has been empowered to do all acts on behalf of the Board except appointment. 8. This Court finds force in the submission of learned counsel for the Bank. As such no case is made out for interference. 9. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed, however, respondent-Bank is directed to expedite disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner within a period of four months from today. (Pankaj Purohit, J.
) 23. 12. 2024 SK
Source: High Court of Uttarakhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.