Smt.Lata Rai v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: E.V. VENUGOPAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-19. Smt.Lata Rai v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
32ee [ ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 20016 OF 2025 Between: 1. Smt. Lata Rai, W/o Late Lajapat Rai, aged 75 years, Occ. Housewife, Rl/o. H No. 4-5-475, Badichowdi, Opp. Hari masjid, Sultan Bazar Hyderabad 2. Sri Amit Rai, S/o Late Lajapat Rai, aged 46 years, Occ. service Rl/o. H No. 4- 5-475, Badichowdi, Opp. Hari masjid, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad 3. Sri Ganesh Rai, S/o Late Giridhar Das, aged 79 years, Occ. Retd Rlio. H No. 4-5-480, Badichowdi, Opp. Hari lVlasjid SultanBazar, Hyderabad 4.. Smt. Sharmila Shah, D/o Ganesh Rai W/o Pranay Kumar, aged 50 years Occ. housewife, Rl/o. H No. 4-5-480, Badichowdi, Opp. Hari Masjid SultanBazar, Hyderabad Rep by their GPA Holder Mr. L. Jaya Reddy S/o Late Raghava Reddy, aged 69 years, Occ. Business Ri/o. H No.
2-951914, Masthan Nagar, Jubilee Hills Hyderabad ... PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principle Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500 O22 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, office at Kongarakalan - 501510 3. The Land Reforms Tribunal i Revenue Divisional Officer, lbrahimpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy District - 501506 4. The Tahsildar, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501501 5. Sri Kaki Laxmaiah Mudiraj, Sio Late Kaki Narsimha, Aged about 61 years, Agriculture Fi/o H. No. 4-7'1, Kongarakalan Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510 6. Sri Kaki Darshan, S/o Late Kaki Narsimha, Aged ir rout 31 years, Occ. Agriculture No 4-72, Kongarakalan Village, lbrahimpir lam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501 510 7. Sri Kaki Sudhakar Mudhiraj, S/o late Kaki Narsimha, I ged about 50 years, '1-55, Kongarakalan Occ. Agriculture R/o Village, lbr rhimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510 8.
Sri Kaki Ramulu, S/o Late Kaki Narasimha, Aged l rout 74 years, Occ. Agriculture F/o 8-3-49/63, Chatrinaka Backside, Old Cl rtrinaka Hyderabad - 500 053 9. Sri Kola Valya, S/o late Hema Nayak Aged about 75 ye rrs, Occ. Agricultural Rl/o H. No. 8-1 12, Kongara Kalan (v), lbrahimpatnam (lM), lR District - 501510 '10. Sri K. Laxman Laxman Naik, S/ o Late Hema Naik I ged about 70 years, @ Occ. Agricultural Fl/o H. No. B-1 16, Kongara Kalan (V), ltr ahimpatnam (M), RR District - 501510 's, 11. Sri Kola Swamy, S/o Late Hema Naik Aged about 64 yea Occ. Agricultural '15, R:/o H. No. 8-1 Kongara Kalan (V), lbrahimpatnam (1r,4), RR District - 501510 12. Sri Kola Shankar, S/o Late Hema Naik, Aged a r rut 61 years, Occ. '13, Agricultural Rl/o H. No. 8-1 Kongara Kalan (V), lbr: himpatnam (M), RR District - 501 5'10 13. Sri Kola Krishna, S/o Late Hema Naik Aged about 54 ye rrs, Occ- Agricultural Rl/o H. No. B-1 13, Kongara Kalan (V), lbrahimpatnam (N/) RR District - 501 510 14.
Sri KakiNarayana, S/o Late Ramaiah, aged about 66, o :c. Agriculture Rl/o 3- 7, Kongarakalan Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Rz rga Reddy District, Telangana State - 501 510 15. Sri Kaki Chakrapani, S/o Late Ramaiah, Aged about 6[), Occ. Agriculture R/o Kongarakalan Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Rar ;a Reddy District, Telangana State - 50'151 0 '16. Sri Kaki Ganesh, S/o Late Ramaiah, Aged about 53, tl ;c. Agriculture Fl/o 6- 15, Kongarakalan Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, F. i nga Reddy District, Telangana State - 50151 0 ,.. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the lligh Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [Vlandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing impugned orders / issuance of Uis 3BE Certificates vide File Nos. L/795/2020, L179612020, dated 08/05/2020 and L179712020 dated 29. 06.
2020 in favour of the Respondent 't Nos. 5 to 6 in respect of Agricultural lands in Sy No. 277, Ac. 1 . 00 gts out of Ac. 6. 31 gts, Sy No. 278,4c. 3,33 gts out of Ac. 9. 32 gts, Sy No. 280, Ac. 3. 16 gts out of Ac. '10. 39 gts, Sy No. 281 , 4c. 3. 04 gts out of 4c. 1O. 27 gts, total admeasuring Ac. 17. 1O gts out oI Ac. 53. 27 gts situated at Kongara Kalan (V), lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District held by Late Giridhar Das, S/o. Late Govind Das with reference under Section 38E of Tenancy Act by reviving the LRT Common Order vide CC Nos. 3373i ll 75,337411175 and 3396/1/75 dated 3110111976.
This was attempted by not following due process of law as contained in Section 38E of HTAL Act and as contemplated under the said act and without issuing mandatory Notice to the petitioners is bad in law and highly illegal arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violating the provisions of Articles 14, 19,21 and 300,4 of Constitution of lndia and by setting aside impugned orders dated 0810512020 and 29. 06. 2020 and to update the Land Records with reference to the CC No. 3373/l/75 vide Common Order dated 3110'111976 also consequently directing the respondents not to interfere of the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in the interest of justice lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to SUSPEND the lmpugned Orders and U/s 38E Certificates vide File Nos. File Nos. L179512O20, L179612020, dated 08. 05.
2020 and L179712020 dated 29. 06. 2020, issued by the 3'd respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI MOHD. NAWAZ HYDER REP. FOR M/s. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1to4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 9,11,12: SRI ROYYALATHIRUPATHAIAH Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5,7,8,6,t,10,13to16:- The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELI 'NGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENT GOPAL WRIT PETITION No. 2OO16 of 2025 Datet 19. 12. 2025 Between: Smt. Lata Rai and three others . Petitioners And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and fifteen others Re spondents ORDER Pursuant to a letter, dated 17. 12. 2025 b1' the liven (Judicial) learned counsel for the petitioners to the Regir; ral seeking permission to withdraw the Writ Petiti rn, this Writ Petition is posted under the caption "for withdrar,r'a ". 2.
When the matter is taken up for consideratir,r . , Sri Pranav, learned counsel, who filed Vakalat on behalf o1 the unoflicial respondents, would fairly submit that the subject natter in this Writ Petition is similar to that of the subject 'r atter in Writ Petition No. 16022 of 2025, wherein this Court >ermitted the petitioners therein to withdraw the said Writ P: -ition rvithout N-- +?. 'tqr \ \ \. , EVV, J Wp_200 t6_2025 granting any liberty to approach the appropriate forum by way of an appropriate application if permissible in law. Therefore, he prayed to pass the same order in this writ petition. 3. Mr. Mohd. Nawaz Hyder, learned counsel representing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners on record would submit that in the letter no liberty was sought for a,d therefore, he has no objection to pass the same order. 4 . Recording the aforesaid submissions, permission as sought for is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/. A. H. S. GOWR] SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR & //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] '1 . One CC to M/s. PILLIX LAW F|RM, Advocate [OpUC] 2. One CC to SRt. ROYYALA THtRUpATHAtnn, AOvocate tOpUCl 3. Two CD Copies B M S I I HIGH COURT DATED:1911212025 1r S f. l fr i:. \ o )s { ;-t:1, ',7 ') { t,) 1t ,ilfECm c ORDER + . , /-! WP. No. 20016 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS V! ITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS p
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.