Vijendernath v. Smt.Swarnalatha Yadav Gaddam
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: SUJOY PAUL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-20. Vijendernath v. Smt.Swarnalatha Yadav Gaddam. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3045 OF 2024 Petition under Article 227 ot the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the in not Disposing lA No. 409 of 2024 in OS No 2397 of 2O24 on the file of th€ Court of the X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad. Between: Vijendernath, Sio. Late Dr. Viswanath Rai, Aged 58 years, R/o- 3€-369/28, Street No. 1 , Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. ... REVISION PETITIONERYPETITIONER/PLAINTIFF AND 1. Smt. Swarnalatha Yadav Gaddam, Wo Gaddam Srinivas Yadav, Aged 4g yea6, Occ. Educationalist R/o H no. 15-3-406, Galbalguda, Gowliguda, Hyderabad. 2. Prakash Chand HUF, Rep. by its Karta. Prakash Chand, S/o Ratanchand, Aged 63 years, Occ. Business. R/o H no 3-6-379/8, 1st Floor. Street No. 3, Street No. 3, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. 3. Prakash Chand, S/o Ratanchand. Aged 63 years, Occ.
Business, R/o H. no. 3- '1st 6-379/8, Floor. Street No 3. Street No. 3, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. 4. Kurimiddi Yadaiah, S/o Kurimiddi Venkataiah, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business, Rt/o H. no. 1-78. Mukunoor, Near Gram Panchayat Office, R R District. 5. Kamlesh Parakh, S/o Vijay Raj Parakh. Aged 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o 1- 2-597136, Flat No. 507, VW Apartment, Domalguda, Hyderabad. 6. Smt. Rekha Parakh, Wo Gajendra parakh, Aged 38 years, occ. Housewife, Rl/o H. No. 1-2-338/tu1, Maina Chamber. Street No. 6, Gaganmahal Road, Domalguda, Hyderabad. ,.. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS lA NO: 1 OF 2024 '1 Petition under Order 39 Rule & 2 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant ad-interim in.
iunction order, restraining the respondents, their representatives, agents or any other person claiming through or under them from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property pending disposal of the Revision Petition. P ETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY All that part and parcel of Portion A of the property bearing municipal No. 3-6-559 and 560, remaining area of 653. 9 sq. yards situated at Himayatnagar, Hyderabad, and bounded by: No(h: Encroached portion of 150 sq. yards in the possession of defendant no. 3 (Mr. Prakash Chand) South: Public Road East: Sched ule B Portion West: Property bearing municipal no. 3-6-547 l5l2 Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. Divya Mundra, representing Sri Damodar Mundra, Advocate Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL C[VIL REVISION PETITION No. 3O45 of 2024 ORDER: 1 Ms.
Divya Mundra, learned counsel representing Sri I Damodar Mundra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the above submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if an-i,, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSIS A T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ \ TION OFFICER To, 1 . The X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad 2. One CC to Sri Damodar Mundra, Advocate [OPUCI . Two CD Copies VIVgh o HIGH COURT DATED: 2011212024 ffd;t,r, 'i (i 1/ FEB zozs \\o,. . +"- '\^q:ggr)' ORDER CRP. No. 3O4S ot 2024 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS W
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.