SURAJ KUMAR v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2020-12-04. SURAJ KUMAR v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 26494 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -457 Year-2019 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR District- Purnia ====================================================== SURAJ KUMAR Son of Yogi Mandal Resident of Village- Janki Nagar Maharji, P. S. - Janki Nagar, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 4 04-12-2020 Heard Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 1, Additional Public Prosecutor for the state through video conferencing. 2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with K. Nagar PS Case No.
457/2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392, 365 of the IPC. 3. The allegation, as per prosecution case, is that three unknown persons riding on a motorcycle intercepted pickup van of the informant and looted the pickup van along with the materials loaded upon it. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner alleged and his name has transpired in this case on the basis of a confessional statement made by co-accused persons, namely, Indu Bhushan @ Indira Bhushan and Md. Alam, who were arrested by the police along Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 26494 of 2020(4) dt. 04-12-2020 2/2 with the pickup van and other materials. 5. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 14. 11. 2019. 6.
Having regard to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the material on record and the fact that petitioner, having no criminal antecedents, is in custody since 14. 11. 2019, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner subject to the condition that the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date in the trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bonds will be liable to be cancelled. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, SURAJ KUMAR be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with K. Nagar PS Case No. 457/2019. 8. It is made clear that at the time of furnishing bail bonds all the parties shall follow the guidelines of social distancing. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) perwez U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.