Shaik Masthan , Harsha v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-07. Shaik Masthan , Harsha v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3168 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA EP. -rE AT HVDERABAD MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6192 OF 2020 Between: Shaik Masthan Harsha, S/o. Shaik Kalesha @ Petitioner/Accused No. 5 AND The State of Telangana, tkough SHO, Miyapur Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Addl. Public Prosecutor, High Court ofJudicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. Respondent /Complainant Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr. P. C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition filed therein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, pending investigation, enquiry and trial into Crime in FIR No 90912020 of Miyapur Police Station, R. R. District; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed therein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri H. B.
Ramcharanlal, Advocate for the Petitioner, and ofthe Asst. Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, the Court made the following. \ THE HOI{OURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHNI\N CR ]MIN. AL PETITION No. 6192 OF 202O ORDER: This petition is fi1ed seeking to grant regular brLil uncler Sections 437 6;t zl39 ol the Code of Criminal Plocedure. 1973 (Cr. P. C. ). l'he Petitioner is Accused No. 5 in Crime No. 909 o12020 pending on the trle of the Station House Ofllcer, N'liyaptrr Police Station, C1,berab,rd. The otfences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 3e,3,366-4, 370 and 370(4) IPC, Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the Immoral Tre. 1'fic (Prevention) Act, 1956, Section 14, 14 (A) (b) read with 14(C) ofthe Foreigners Acq 1946 and Sections 5 ard 6 read with I 7 of Protection of Children lrom Sexual Olfences Act. i 01 2 (tbr short'POCSO Act'). 2. Heard Sri Fl. B. Ramcharan Lal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Asst. Public Prosecutor for the respondent. 3.
On perusal of the remand report would reveal . hat the petitioner herein i; owner of the hotel by name SV Calapyso Luxr"rrl roorns (OYO), C)td Haf-eezpet, Miyapur, and that he has arranged rooms to the oth,:r accused for committing ofl'ences. The allegation against the other accused is that they have kidnapped a minor girl from Bangladesh 1br prostilution in the hotel belongs to the petitioner herein. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit -hat the petitioner is not a\vare of the said kidnap of the minor girl/r'ii:tim by the A. 1 to A. 4 an,l as a part of business, he has given them a toom to them. Learned counsel for the \ petitioner would submit that the Police have already completed investigation by recording the statements of material witnesses. 4. On instructions, learned Public Prosecutor ivould submit that the Police have already arrested the A. 1 and A. 2 to A. 4 ale absconding.
He would futher submit that the Police have recorded the statements of six u,itnesses including the material witnesses. This Court has granted regular bail to ,{. 6 to A. 9. The petitioner was arrested on 17 . 09. 2020 5. Considering the said facts, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner/A. 5. 6. Accordingly, the present Criminal Petition is allowed granting bail to the petitioner with the following conditions: i) The petitioner' A. 5 shall fumish a personal bond for an -amount of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two (02) sureties for like sunr each to the satislaction of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L. B. Nagar. ii) The petitioner A. 5 shall appear before the - Station House Officer, Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad, everyday between 10. 00 a. m. and 05. 00 p. m. till completion of investigation and filing of final report. iii) The petitioner shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/. X SHYLESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// U-t' SECTION OFFICER To I The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad,. Ranga Reddy District, at L. B. Nagar. 2 The ? rincipal Junior civil Judge, cum Addr. ri""o-pori,- Magistrate, Kukatpally, at Prashanth Nagar, Cyberabad. 'III 3. The Station House Officer, Miyapur police Station, Cyberabad. 4. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Cherlapalty, Rungu R"aJv li. tri. t. 5. Two_C_Cs to Public prosecutor, High Coun of f. frig-u, ui Hyderabad (OUT) 6. one CC to Sri H. B. Ramcharan Lal, Advocate (OPU-C) 7. one Spare Copy ? aPP)'t HIGH COURT KL,J DATE:7-12-2020 ORDER CRL. P. NO. 6192 0I'2020 a-rre c I ffi:tr t*eDY BAIL
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.