Mr. J.C. Sathishkumar v. Mrs. J.C. Rekha and another
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2025-12-15. Mr. J.C. Sathishkumar v. Mrs. J.C. Rekha and another. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
A. No. 6256 of 2025 in C. S. Sr. No. 174553 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A No. 6256 of 2025 IN CS SR NO. 174553 OF 2025 1. Mr. J. C. Sathishkumar S/o. Late. Mr. J. S. Chakrapani, No. 23, Muthiapa Street, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai-600 030 Applicant(s) Vs 1. Mrs. J. C. Rekha and another D/o. late Mr. J. S. Chakrapani, Both at No. 23, Muthiappa Street, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030. 2. Mr. J. C. Sanjeevi Kumar S/o. Late J. S. Chakrapani Respondent(s) CS SR No. 174553 of 2025 1. Mr. J. C. Sathishkumar S/o. Late. Mr. J. S. Chakrapani, No. 23, Muthiapa Street, Shenoy Nagar, Ch-30 Plaintiff(s) Vs 1. Mrs. J. C. Rekha and another D/o. Late. Mr. J. S. Chakrapani, No. 23, Muthiapa Street, Shenoy Nagar, Ch-30 1/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis A. No. 6256 of 2025 in C. S. Sr. No. 174553 of 2025 2. J. C. Sanjeevi Kumar S/o. Late. Mr. J. S. Chakrapani, No. 23, Muthiapa Street, Shenoy Nagar, Ch-30 Defendant(s) A No.
6256 of 2025 For Applicant(s): M/s. C. Sivanesan M. Baskaran For Respondent: ORDER This application has been filed by the applicant seeking grant leave to sue the item II and III of the schedule properties. 2. According to the applicant, he is the plaintiff in the main suit. He filed the suit for partition and separate possession. The Item I of the schedule mentioned property is situated within jurisdiction of this Court whereas Item II and III of the schedule mentioned properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, a substantial part of the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court and the suit can be instituted before this Court. The main prayer is for partition thereby the suit can also be filed before this Court. Therefore, the plaintiffs filed this present petition. 3. This Court heard petitioner side and perused the records. 4.
Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit and that the item II and III of the schedule mentioned properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court and that substantial part of cause of action has arose within the jurisdiction of this 2/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis A. No. 6256 of 2025 in C. S. Sr. No. 174553 of 2025 Court, and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to allow this application. 5. Accordingly, this application is allowed. 6. The Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. 15. 12. 2025 mtl 3/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis A. No. 6256 of 2025 in C. S. Sr. No. 174553 of 2025 P. DHANABAL, J. mtl A No. 6256 of 2025 IN CS SR NO. 174553 of 2025 15. 12. 2025 4/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.