LawSphereX

Kolli Apparao v. State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: K. SARATH

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-03. Kolli Apparao v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

\ [ 3302 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECE[/BER TWO IHOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 4938 OF 2022 Between: Kolli Apparao, Kolli Veerabadraiah, Aged about 62 years. Occ : Retd Employee, -S-/o Lawyerpeta, Mahalakshmi Towers, bngote, prakasham P_o _ltgl -No. 303, bis[rict, AP-523002. ..... PETITIONER AND 'l . State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, T. S. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, RR District. 4. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....

RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one ' in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No_3, 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering and trying to remove the fencing stones in respect of his Plot No. 5'l 1, admeasuring 300 Sq. yds in Sy. No. 36/24, situgted at phase ll, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the Respondent No. 3,4 and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No. 51 1 , admeasuring 300 Sq.

yds, comprised in ry sy. No. 36/24, situated at phase il, Vinayak Nagar coror i Gopanpaily Viilage, Serilingampally l\rlandar, Ranga Reddy District, without fo r ,wing due process of law and without issuing notice. I. A. NO:1 OF 2022 Petition Under section i 51 cpc praying that in the ( i cumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rrr: 7 be pleased to direct Respondent No. 3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates nol l) interfere with the possession of the Petitioner in respect of her plot No. 1, admeasuring 300 sq. yds' comprised in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at phase I, \'i rayak Nagar corony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga R,: dy District, without following due process of law and without issuing any notice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ESLAVATH RAJU Counsel for the Respondents : AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER w IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE K.

SARATH WRIT PETITION No. 4938 of 2022 Date: O3'a December 2O25 Between: Ko1li Apparao ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hvderabad & three others. ... Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri Eslavath Raju, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents ald perused the material on record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering with and attempting to remove the fencing stones in respect of petitioner's Plot No. 511, admeasuring 300 Sq. yards in Sy. No.

36/24, situated at Phase II, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to dispossess the l re petitioner from his plot, without issuing any l >tice and without lollowing due process of 1aw, as illegal and arbitrar. , 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further s rbmits rhat u. hiie admitting thc matter, this Court passed in i t rim orcier dated 07. O2. 2022 with a direction to maintain status qur :xisting as on that date until the next date of hearing in respect of th, subject property. However, in spite of lapse of more than three a I d half vears, the respondent authorities did not file a counter or . r vacate petition denying the averments made by the petitioner in tlr \. \,'rit alfidavlt. In viern, of the same.

iearnecl counsel requested this t lourt to a11ou, the Writ Petition by directing the respondent authont r s not to interfere with the possessior-r of the petitioner in respect to t l : subject property u,ithout following due process of 1aw. 4. on the other hand, rearned Assistant Go'er r ment pleader rbr Reve. ue submits that if the petitioner is in possess on of the subject property, the respondents will not interfere witl the petitioner,s possession of the subject property, without followjr g due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate orcl rs. 5' In view of the submissions made on either side , this petition writ is disposed of directing the respondent authorities _n: , to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in plot No. 51 1 , i dmeasuring 3O0 Sq. yards in sy. No. 36/24, situated at phase II, Vina" rk Nagar corony, w Gopanpally Village, Serilingarnpally Maldal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due procedure of law.

There shall be no order as to COSTS 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending petition, in this Writ shall stand closed. SD/. S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /iTRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To Revenue, T. S Secretariat. State of 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Telangana at Hyderabad. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 2 Nagar Division, RR District' J the nevenre Divisional Officer, Rajendra IVIandal, Ranga Reddy District' 4 The Tahsildar, Serilingampally E High Court for the State of Telangana at f*o Cbt to Cp fOn"REVENUE, \ Hyderabad. [OUT] ' 6 oire CC to SRI ESLAVATH RAJU, Advocate IOPUC] 7 Two CD Copies SA Iy HIGH COURT DATED:0311212025 Ar€ 1P,'E' v' a) ? -q?! t) 0 s * C) , ORDER WP. No. 4938 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE W. P WITHOUT COSTS. llrlu

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.