AMRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: NUPUR BHATI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-01-30. AMRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2025:RJ-JD:6105] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5155/2022 Sushil Kumar S/o Late Shri Balveer Singh, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Vpo Jogiwara, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Hanumangarh, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. 3. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Bhadra, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1057/2023 Vinod Kumar Patidar S/o Shri Hakar Ji Patidar, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Avalpura, Jharas, District Banswara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2.
The Additional Food Commissioner, Consumer Affairs Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The District Supply Officer, Banswara, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11262/2023 Dharamveer Singh S/o Late Shri Rajendra Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Raidhana, Tehsil Ladnu, District Nagaur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary Cum Joint Commissioner, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. [2025:RJ-JD:6105] (2 of 4) [CW-5155/2022] 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Nagaur. 3. The Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti, Ladnu, District Nagaur. ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11563/2023 Amrendra Kumar Mishra S/o Shri Laxmi Kant Mishra, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of 10-G-14, Rc Vyas Colony, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Food Civil Supply And Consumer Cases Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Additional Commissioner (Food), Rajasthan State Food And Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, 5Th Floor, Kisan Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11969/2023 Sohan Singh S/o Shri Jagveer Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Weir, Samraya, District Bharatpur (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Pali District Pali. 3. The Vikas Adhikari Panchayat Samiti Sojat, District Pali. ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.
12685/2023 Surendra Goyal S/o Shri Jagdish Goyal, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Village Devli Kallan, Tehsil Raiput, District Pali, At Present Posted As Gram Vikas Adhikari / Gram Sevak, Gram Panchayat Pipaliya Kallan, Panchayat Samiti Raipur, District Pali (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus [2025:RJ-JD:6105] (3 of 4) [CW-5155/2022] 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Establishment Committee, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Pali. 3. The Administration And Establishment Committee Of The Panchayat Samiti Raipur, Through Its Pradhan/ Development Officer, Raipur, District Pali. 4. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Raipur, District Pali (Raj. ). 5. Gram Panchayat Pipaliya Kallan, Through Its Sarpanch, Panchayat Samiti Raipur, District Pali. 6.
Shri Puran Singh Sankhla, Gram Vikas Adhikari/ Gram Sevak, Gram Panchayat Biratiya Kallan, Panchayat Samiti Raipur, District Pali. ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15512/2023 Koushalya Choudhary D/o Shri Mukh Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Jaitsar, Sardar Shahar, Churu, District Churu (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector (Land Records), Bikaner. 3. The Tehsildar (Land Record), Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Chhaba for Mr. J. S. Bhaleria Mr. Yashpal Khileree Ms. Nandipna Gehlot for Mr. Manish Patel. For Respondent(s) : Mr. D. S. Pidiyar, AAAG for Mr. S. S. Ladrecha, AAG. Mr. Deepak Vaishnav for Mr. Kuldeep Vaishnav, Dy. G. C. HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI Order [2025:RJ-JD:6105] (4 of 4) [CW-5155/2022] 30/01/2025 1. Heard. 2.
Learned counsel representing the petitioners jointly submit that the issue involved in these writ petitions is squarely covered by the order dated 28. 07. 2023 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petitions led by SBCWP No. 3053/2021 titled “Ramesh Kumar Parihar v. State of Rajasthan & Anr. ”. Learned counsel further submit that the respondents while exercising Rule 25A of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 have passed the impugned order in a mechanical manner in order to accommodate other candidates. Learned counsel further submit that the order dated 28. 07. 2023 has been passed while taking into consideration the judgment dated 13. 03. 2018 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in SBCWP No. 6261/2017 titled “Hemendra Kumar Trivedi v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. ”. 3. Learned counsel representing the respondents are not in a position to refute the same. 4.
Thus, in view of the aforesaid submissions, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of Hemendra Kumar Trivedi (supra). The interim orders are made absolute. 5. Needless to observe that the respondents shall be free to pass fresh posting order(s) qua the petitioners, if the administrative exigency so warrants in accordance with law. 6. Stay application as well as all other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (DR. NUPUR BHATI),J 267 to 273-/Devesh/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.