UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. v. BETTY SEBASTIAN PHILIP AND 9 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN, CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2025-11-12. UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. v. BETTY SEBASTIAN PHILIP AND 9 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Serial No. 04 HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA Daily List AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 45 of 2024 Date of order: 12. 11. 2025 1. Union of India represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi-110011. 2. The Secretary, Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi. 3. The Director, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health & Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), Mawdiangdiang, Shillong 793018 …Petitioners - versus - 1. Betty Sebastian Philip 2. Chandan Baruah 3. Narendra Kumar 4. Synlartimai Rynjah 5. Golap Baishya 6. Badabakerlin Lyttan 7. Frederick Corban Kharwanlang 8. Debdutta Bhattacharyya 9. Ibasaralin Pyrtuh 10. Arwaka Passah …. Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Soumen Sen, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioners : Dr N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms K. Gurung, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr S. P. Mahanta, Sr Adv. with Mr T. Dkhar, Adv.
i) Whether approved for Yes/No reporting in Law journals etc. : ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble, the Chief Justice) (Oral) We have heard the learned Deputy Solicitor General. 2. It is submitted that the respondents were promoted prior to the impugned order and their entitlement has to be calculated taking into consideration their date of promotion in order to avail the benefits under MACP. We are not entering into the said issue as we are only required to decide the legality of the order passed by the Tribunal. The manner and mode of execution and implementation of the said order are not presently before us. 3. In view of the fact that similar issues have already been decided in WP(C) No. 366 of 2024 on 04. 11. 2025, this application is also disposed of in terms of the said order. 4. It appears that in paragraph 4 of the order dated 04. 11.
2025, after the word ‘Radiographers’ there is a ‘full-stop’ which is required to be deleted and the fresh sentence starting with ‘T’ is to be replaced with ‘t’. This correction shall be incorporated in the order dated 04. 11. 2025 passed in WP(C) No. 366 of 2024, which is treated as on the day’s list for the limited purpose of correction. The corrected order shall form part of the present order. (H. S. Thangkhiew) (Soumen Sen) Judge Chief Justice Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by SYLVANA LIZ KHARBHIH Date: 2025. 11. 13 10:40:41 IST
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.