Gurumukh Bhirani v. Smt. Resham Bhirani
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RAJANI DUBEY,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2020-11-17. Gurumukh Bhirani v. Smt. Resham Bhirani. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
FAM No. 123 of 2016 & FAM No. 124 of 2016 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR FAM No. 123 of 2016 1. Gurumukh Bhirani S/o Late Hakikat Rai Bhirani, Aged About 38 Years R/o Near Shankar Daal Mill, Bhagat Singh Ward, Bhatapara, Police Station And Post Bhatapara, Civil And Revenue District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant Versus 1. Smt. Resham @ Geeta Bhirani W/o Gurumukh Bhirani, Aged About 36 Years R/o Pragati Vihar, Mahavir Nagar, Raipur, Police Station And Post Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent FAM No. 124 of 2016 1. Gurumukh Bhirani S/o Late Hakikat Rai Bhirani, Aged About 38 Years R/o Near Shankar Daal Mill, Bhagat Singh Ward, Bhatapara, Police Station And Post Bhatapara, Civil And Revenue District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant Versus 1. Smt.
Resham Bhirani W/o Gurumukh Bhirani, Aged About 36 Years R/o Pragati Vihar, Mahavir Nagar, Raipur, Police Station And Post Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent FAM No. 123 of 2016 & FAM No. 124 of 2016 For Appellant Mr. Manoj Paranjape, Advocate appears along with appellant [Mr. Gurumukh Bhirani] in both the appeals. For Respondent Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan & Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocates Hon'ble Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Hon'ble Mrs. Rajani Dubey, J. Order on Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. 17-11-2020 1. At the very outset, Mr. Manoj Paranjape, learned counsel for the appellant in both the appeals, would inform that the appellant has filed I. A. No. 1 (FAM No. 123 of 2016) & I. A. No. 2 (FAM No. 124 of 2016) seeking withdrawal of both the appeals. 2. Mr. Gurumukh Bhirani, appellant in both the appeals, states that FAM No. 123 of 2016 is against dismissal of an application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act whereas in FAM No.
124 of 2016 he is challenging the decree of divorce granted in favour of respondent wife Mrs. Resham Bhirani. By lapse of time he has reconciled with the situation and now he also wants to live separately, therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw both the appeals. FAM No. 123 of 2016 & FAM No. 124 of 2016 3. On due consideration, I. A. No. 1 filed in FAM No. 123 of 2016) & I. A. No. 2 filed in FAM No. 124 of 2016 are allowed and both the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Rajani Dubey) Judge Judge Gowri
Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.