THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S SAKETH INDIA LTD v. SRI C MARIYAPPA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: V SRISHANANDA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-12-19. THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S SAKETH INDIA LTD v. SRI C MARIYAPPA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CRL. RP No. 464 of 2014 C/W CRL. RP No. 462 of 2014 CRL. RP No. 463 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 464 OF 2014 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 462 OF 2014 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 463 OF 2014 IN CRL. RP No. 464/2014 BETWEEN: THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S SAKETH INDIA LTD. , REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR TH NO. 53/B, 12 BLOCK, TH 10 CROSS, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 Digitally …PETITIONER signed by (BY SRI. AMBAJI RAO NAJRE, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) ANJALI M Location: AND: High Court of Karnataka SAKETH INDIA KARMIKARA SANGHA, HUNASAMARANAHALLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 076, REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ARUN KUMAR Y. H. , ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. S. VENUGOPAL, ADVOCATE) - 2 - CRL. RP No. 464 of 2014 C/W CRL. RP No. 462 of 2014 CRL. RP No. 463 of 2014 THIS CRL. RP IS FILED U/S. 397(1) R/W 401 OF CR. P.
C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 6. 6. 2014 PASSED BY THE P. O. , F. T. C. (SESSIONS)-XI, BANGALORE IN CRL. A. NO. 185/2013 IS PRODUCED HERETO AS ANNEXURE-A AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18. 3. 2013 PASSED BY THE VIII A. C. M. M. , BANGALORE IN C. C. NO. 28936/2009 PRODUCED HERETO AS ANNEXURE-B. IN CRL. RP NO. 462/2014 BETWEEN: THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S SAKETH INDIA LTD. , REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR TH NO. 53/B, 12 BLOCK, TH 10 CROSS, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. AMBAJI RAO NAJARE, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SRI. S. PUTTANNA S/O LATE SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/A NO. 30, SUGGATTA, HUNASAMARANAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 001 ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ARUN KUMAR Y. H. , ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. S. VENUGOPAL, ADVOCATE) - 3 - CRL. RP No. 464 of 2014 C/W CRL. RP No. 462 of 2014 CRL. RP No. 463 of 2014 THIS CRL. RP IS FILED U/S. 397(1) R/W 401 OF CR. P. C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 6. 6. 2014 PASSED BY THE P. O. , F. T. C.
(SESSIONS)-XI, BANGALORE IN CRL. A. NO. 183/2013 IS PRODUCED HERETO AS ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE PETR. IN C. C. NO. 31388/2009 PASSED BY THE VIII A. C. M. M. , BANGALORE DATED 18. 3. 2013 PRODUCED HERETO AS ANNEXURE-B. IN CRL. RP NO. 463/2014 BETWEEN: THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S SAKETH INDIA LTD. , REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR TH NO. 53/B, 12 BLOCK, TH 10 CROSS, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. AMBAJI RAO NAJRE, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SRI. C. MARIYAPPA S/O. CHANNAPPA, MAJOR, R/A HUNASAMARANAHALLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 076. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ARUN KUMAR Y. H. , ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. S. VENUGOPAL, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL. RP IS FILED U/S. 397(1) R/W 401 OF CR. P. C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 6. 6. 2014 PASSED BY THE P. O. , F. T. C. (SESSIONS)-XI, BANGALORE - 4 - CRL. RP No. 464 of 2014 C/W CRL. RP No. 462 of 2014 CRL. RP No. 463 of 2014 IN CRL. A. NO.
184/2013 IS PRODUCED HERETO ANNEXURE- A AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18. 3. 2013 PASSED BY THE VIII A. C. M. M. , BANGALORE IN C. C. NO. 1957/2010 PRODUCED HERETO AS ANNEXURE-B. THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None present on behalf of the revision petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. The revision petitioner has suffered an order of conviction under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The matters are pending since, 2014. 3. A feeble attempt was made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner at the time of mentioning the cases for adjournment that the revision petitioner-company is not in existence. However, the prayer for adjournment was rejected and thereafter, when the case was taken up for final hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. - 5 - CRL. RP No. 464 of 2014 C/W CRL. RP No. 462 of 2014 CRL.
RP No. 463 of 2014 4. Learned counsel for the respondent refutes the submission made on behalf of the revision petitioner that the revision petitioner - company is not in existence. 5. Taking note of these aspects of the matter, left with no alternative, the revision petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SS List No. : 1 Sl No. : 68
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.