MANGAL SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Court: High Court of Uttarakhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Uttarakhand judgment dated 2025-11-14. MANGAL SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2025:UHC:10085 Of f i ce N o t e s, r e p o r t s, o r d e r s o r p r o ce e d i n g s SL. D a t e o r d i r e ct i o n s COU RT’ S OR JU D GE’ S ORD ERS N o . a n d Re g i s t r a r ’ s o r d e r w i t h Si g n a t u r e s W PSS/ 1 0 8 9 / 2 0 2 0 , W PSS/ 1 1 9 4 / 2 0 2 0 W PSS/ 1 4 0 5 / 2 0 2 0 , W PSS/ 1 4 0 9 / 2 0 2 0 W PSS/ 1 4 1 1 / 2 0 2 0 , W PSS/ 1 4 2 6 / 2 0 2 0 W PSS/ 1 6 6 3 / 2 0 2 0 , W PSS/ 1 6 6 5 / 2 0 2 0 W PSS/ 1 6 6 6 / 2 0 2 0 , W PSS/ 1 6 6 7 / 2 0 2 0 W PSS/ 1 6 6 8 / 2 0 2 0 , W PSS/ 1 6 6 9 / 2 0 2 0 W PSS/ 1 6 7 0 / 2 0 2 0 , W PSS/ 1 6 7 1 / 2 0 2 0 W PSS/ 1 6 7 2 / 2 0 2 0 , W PSS/ 1 6 7 3 / 2 0 2 0 W PSS/ 1 6 7 4 / 2 0 2 0 , W PSS/ 8 4 / 2 0 2 1 W PSS/ 8 8 / 2 0 2 1 , W PSS/ 8 9 / 2 0 2 1 W PSS/ 9 1 / 2 0 2 1 , W PSS/ 9 3 / 2 0 2 1 W PSS/ 9 5 / 2 0 2 1 H o n ’ b l e M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J. Mr. Bhupendra Singh Bisht , Advocat e, for t he pet it ioners. Mr. Narayan Dat t , St anding Counsel, for t he St at e.
( 2) Pet it ioners were appoint ed as Const able ( Minist erial) in police depart m ent . According t o t hem , t hey were subsequent ly prom ot ed as Assist ant Sub I nspect or ( Minist erial) on different dat es. Pet it ioners claim t hat t hey are ent it led t o Grade Pay of ₹4800 w. e. f. 1. 1. 2009, as per t he Governm ent Order dat ed 27. 7. 2015 and 15. 6. 2018, which according t o t hem is arbit rarily denied t o t hem . By m eans of t hese w rit pet it ions, pet it ioners have sought a direct ion t o t he respondent s t o pay t hem enhanced Grade Pay of ₹4600 and Grade pay of ₹4800 w. e. f. 1. 1. 2009 with all consequent ial benefit s at par w it h incum bent s, direct ly recruit ed on t he post of Sub I nspect or. ( 3) Learned St at e Counsel, however, disput es t he subm ission m ade by learned Counsel for t he pet it ioners t hat pet it ioners are entitled to Grade Pay of ₹4800.
( 4) Since pet it ioners have sought a direct ion t o grant a part icular benefit and 2025:UHC:10085 t hey have also m ade represent at ion before t he com pet ent aut horit y st aking claim for such benefit , t herefore, t his Court t hinks t hat ends of j ust ice would be m et if pet it ioners are perm it t ed t o m ake det ailed fresh represent at ion t o t he Direct or General of Police. I f pet it ioners m ake such represent at ion w it hin t hree weeks from t oday, decision t hereupon shall be t aken w it hin six m ont hs t hereaft er, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. 5. Wit h t he aforesaid direct ion, t he writ pet it ion is disposed of. ( M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J. ) 1 4 . 1 1 . 2 0 2 5 Pr Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,2. 5. 4.
20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503,postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND,serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMARDate: 2025. 11. 17 09:41:22 +05'30' 2025:UHC:10085
Source: High Court of Uttarakhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.