GAJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: SANJEET PUROHIT
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-03-17. GAJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5306/2017 1. Gajendra Singh S/o Shri Satya Dan Singh, By Caste Rajpurohit, Resident Of Majisa Bas, Govt. Press Road, Bikaner 2. Panna Lal S/o Shri Sadula Ram, By Caste Prajapat, Resident Of Kumharon Ki Mod Gangashahar, Bikaner Karni Dan S/o Shri Durga Dan, By Caste Charan, Resident 3. Of Indira Colony, Bikaner Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Deen Dayal, By Caste Punjabi- 4. Sindhi, Resident Of Mukta Prasad Nagar Bikaner Kan Singh S/o Shri Shaitan Singh, By Caste Rajput, 5. Resident Of Karni Nagar Bikaner Sohan Singh S/o Shri Banshi Singh, By Caste Rajput, 6. Resident Of Mukta Prasad Nagar Bikaner Satya Narayan Sharma S/o Shri Hema Ram Sharma, By 7. Caste Sharma-Brahmin, Resident Of Indira Colony, Bikaner 8. Chhail Ram S/o Shri Sugna Ram, By Caste Harijan, Resident Of Goga Gate, Harijan Basti Bikaner Gaina Ram S/o Shri Ghewar Ram, By Caste Meghwal, 9.
Resident Of Near Gurudwara Tilak Nagar Road, Bikaner Madan Singh S/o Shri Gang Ram Singh, By Caste 10. Rajpurohit, Resident Of Karni Nagar, Bikaner 11. Ram Singh S/o Shri Jagannath, By Caste Nath, Resident Of Urmul Colony, Bikaner 12. Lrs. Of Naina Ram S/o Shri Goverdhan Ram, By Caste Prajapat, Resident Of Kumharon Ka Mod Gangashahar, Bikaner Smt. Narmada Devi W/o Late Shri Naina Ram, A/a 59 12/1. years, B/c Prajapat, R/o Kumharon ka Mod, Gangashahar, Bikaner, Raj – 334401 Naresh Prajapat S/o Late Shri Naina Ram, A/a 39 years, 12/2. B/c Prajapat, R/o Kumharon ka Mod, Gangashahar, Bikaner, Raj – 334401 12/3. Vijay Prajapat S/o Late Shri Naina Ram, A/a 34 years, B/c Prajapat, R/o Kumharon ka Mod, Gangashahar, Bikaner, Raj – 334401 Anu Prajapat W/o Shri Manish Prajapat, D/o Late Shri 12/4. Naina Ram, A/a 38 years, B/c Prajapat, R/o Agarwal Colony, Phalodi, Jodhpur (2 of 3) [CW-5306/2017] Pinki Prajapat W/o Shri Baldev, D/o Late Shri Naina Ram, 12/5.
A/a 34 years, B/c Prajapat, R/o Ward No. 18, VPO Lalgarh Jatan, Sadulshahar, Sriganganagar, Raj. 13. Gaj Raj Singh S/o Shri Pep Singh, By Caste Rajput, Resident Of Urmul Nagar Ganganagar Road, Bikaner At Present Residing At Ajmer 14. Poonam Chand S/o Shri Shiv Prakash Gehlot, By Caste, Resident Of 44, Gajner Power House, Bikaner ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Cooperative Department Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur 2. Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited, Saras Sankul, J. l. n. Marg Jaipur, Through Its Managing Director 3. The Uttriya Rajasthan Sahkari Dugdh Utpadak Sangh Limited, Ganga Nagar Road, In Front Of Lalgarh Palace, Bikaner, Through Its Managing Director ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C. S. Kotwani with Mr. Yash Rajpurohit Mr. Milap Chopra For Respondent(s) : Mr. C. V. S. Shekhawat HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order 24/05/2024 1. Matter comes upon two applications. 2.
The first application has been preferred for substitution of legal representatives of deceased petitioner No. 12. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The legal representatives of deceased petitioner No. 12 are permitted to be taken on record. 4. Amended cause title as filed is taken on record. 5. Office to make online amendments. (3 of 3) [CW-5306/2017] 6. The second application has been preferred on behalf of legal representatives of deceased petitioner No. 12 for withdrawal of the present writ petition qua them. 7. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not object to the said withdrawal. 8. In view of the same, the application is allowed. Legal representatives of deceased petitioner No. 12 are permitted to withdraw the present writ petition and the writ petition is hence, dismissed as withdrawn qua them. (REKHA BORANA),J 259-T. Singh/-
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.