DILBAG SINGH v. THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-14. DILBAG SINGH v. THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13159/2020 Dilbag Singh S/o Shri Neki Ram, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 12, Sadulpur, District Churu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Managing Director, Parivahan Marg (Headquarter), Jaipur. 2. The Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Head Office, Jaipur. 3. The Financial Advisor And Chief Accounts Officer, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Head Office, Jaipur. 4. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Rajsamand Depot, Rajsamand. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr.
Suniel Purohit All through Cisco Webex App JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 14/12/2020 It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court in Daulat Ram Vs. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. (S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9687/2015, decided on 01. 10. 2015) and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment. (2 of 2) [CW-13159/2020] This Court, while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra),directed as under:- “In this background, these writ petitions deserve to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporations directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p. a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment.
The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to the concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of dues at the earliest. No order as to costs. ” In view of above, this writ petition is also allowed in light of the judgment in case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions, as quoted hereinbefore. The stay application also stands disposed of. (DINESH MEHTA),J 93-A. Arora/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.