NAINA SOOD v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2025-05-02. NAINA SOOD v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8957-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 02. 05. 2025 Naina Sood .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Himmat Singh Sidhu, Advocate and Mr. Gourav Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, Assistant A. G. Punjab ***** AMARJOT BHATTI, J. (Oral) 1. Petitioner Naina Sood has filed petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for issuance of direction to respondent No. 2 for compliance of order dated 16. 12. 2023 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana bearing case No. UCR/174/2018 titled “State Vs. Unknown” (Annexure P-2), whereby respondent authorities are directed to make further investigation in FIR No. 83 dated 25. 10. 2024 under Section 307, 354, 448, 323, 506, 148, 149 of IPC registered at Police Station Division No.
3, Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) as well as another cross case under Section 323, 354, 451, 148, 149 of IPC registered at the instance of complainant/petitioner. 2. In compliance of order dated 17. 03. 2025, status report filed through Registry and copy thereof supplied to learned counsel for petitioner. As per status report, further investigation has already been conducted in present matter and no new facts came on record, as a result CRM-M-8957-2025 (O&M) -2- cancellation report was submitted before learned Magistrate on 29. 03. 2025 and is fixed for 06. 05. 2025. During investigation, it was revealed that due to property dispute, both the cases were falsely registered by both the parties against each other. 3. In view of aforesaid factual position, it is clear that untrace report has been submitted before learned Magistrate and is pending adjudication. Therefore, no further direction is required.
Present petition stands disposed of, with liberty to petitioner to seek appropriate remedy before the trial Court, as per law. 4. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 02. 05. 2025 lalit Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.