ARFID S/O MUHARU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-20. ARFID S/O MUHARU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JP:52490] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14289/2024 Arfid S/o Muharu, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Fahari Bas, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sabir Ali, Mr. Shiv Kumar Jangid For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 20/12/2024 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 314/2024 registered at Police Station Govindgarh (Alwar), District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4) and 336(2) of BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 10. 10. 2024 and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. [2024:RJ-JP:52490] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14289/2024] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 10. 10. 2024 and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6.
Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Arfid S/o Muharu in connection with FIR No. 314/2024 registered at Police Station Govindgarh (Alwar), District Alwar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J pcg/169
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.