Alluri Gopala Raju, v. 1. Kolli Appanna AT Yerra Appanna
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: A V RAVINDRA BABU
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2024-04-25. Alluri Gopala Raju, v. 1. Kolli Appanna AT Yerra Appanna. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
-T- ' IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL »» TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR I Z yirX' PRESENT O THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. V. RAVINDRA BABU APPEAL SUIT NO: 356 OF 2017 against the Appeal Under Order 41 Rule 1 R/W Section 96 of C. P. C. of 2007 on the file of Judgment and Decree dated 22. 12. 2016 in O. S. No. 317 the II Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam. Between: Alluri Gopala Raju, S/o. late Krishnam Raju, Aged about 45 years, Occ; Business, R/o. H. No. 86-2-17/11, Pragathi Marg, Vadrevu Nagar, Rajahmundry. ... Appellant/Plaintiff AND 1. Kolli Appanna @ Yerra Appanna, S/o. Chinnayya, Aged about 59 years, Occ: Cultivation, Yerakannapalem hamlet of Rachapalli, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhpatnam District 2. Kolli Atchiyyamma, W/o. Appannaa @ Yerra Appanna, Aged about 59 years, Occ: Cultivation. R/o. Yerakannapalem hamlet of Rachapalli, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhpatnam District. 3. Kolli Rama Rao, S/o.
Appanna @ Yerra Appanna, Aged about 42 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Yerakannapalem hamlet of Rachapalli, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhpatnam District. 4. Kolli Appa Rao, S/o. Appanna @ Yerra Appanna, Aged about 40 years,- Occ; Cultivation, R/o. Yerakannapalem hamlet of Rachapalli, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhpatnam District. 5. Kolli Sattibabu, S/o. Appanna @ Yerra Appanna, Aged about 35 years. Occ; Cultivation, R/o. Yerakannapalem hamlet of Rachapall I, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhpatnam District. (Amended as per the orders of the Court, dated 23-11-2011 in I. A. No. 1600/2010) 6. Kolli Manikyam, S/o. Appanna @ Yerra Appanna Aged about 45 years. Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Yerakannapalem hamlet of Rachapalli, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhpatnam District 7. Kannuri Rajulamma, W/o, Sannibabu. Aged about 55 years. Occ: Cultivation. Kannuripalem, Kasimkota Mandal. (Amended us per the orders of the Court, dated 26-08-2015 in I. A No. 1745/2010) ...
Respondents/Defendants Counsel for the Appellant: SRI. PRABHAKAR SRIPADA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI G RAMA GOPAL The Court made the following: APHC010217042017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3364] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A V RAVINDRA BABU FIRST APPEAL NO: 356/2017 Between: ABOUT 1. ALLURI GOPALA RAJU„ S/0. LATE KRISHNAM RAJU. AGED 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/0. H. NO. 86-2-17/11, PRAGATHI MARG, VADREVU NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY. ... APPELLANT AND 1. 1 KOLLI APPANNA YERRA APPANNA, S/0. CHINNAYYA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS OCC: CULTIVATION, YERAKANNAPALEM HAMLET OF RACHAPALLI MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, VISAKHPATNAM DISTRICT 2. KOLLI ATCHIYYAMMA, W/0. APPANNAA @ YERRA APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION. R/0. YERAKANNAPALEM HAMLET OF RACHAPALLI, MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, VISAKHPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. KOLLI RAMA RAO, S/0. APPANNA @ YERRA APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/0.
YERAKANNAPALEM HAMLET OF RACHAPALLI. MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, VISAKHPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. KOLLI APPA RAO, S/0. APPANNA @ YERRA APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/0. YERAKANNAPALEM HAMLET OF RACHAPALLI, MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, VISAKHPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. KOLLI SATTIBABU, S/0. APPANNA @ YERRA APPANNA, AGED r ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. YERAKANNAPALEM HAMLET OF RACHAPALLI, MAKAVARAPALEM MANUAL, VISAKHPATNAM DISTRICT. (AMENDED AS PER THE ORDERS'OF - THE COURT, DATED 23-11-2011 IN LA. NO. 1600/2010) 6. KOLLI MANIKYAM, S/0. APPANNA @ YERRA APPANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC; CULTIVATION, R/O. YERAKANNAPALEM HAMLET OF RACHAPALLI, MAKAVARAPALEM MANUAL, VISAKHPATNAM DISTRICT 7. KANNURI RAJULAMMA, W/0, SANNIBABU. AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. OCC; CULTIVATION. KANNURIPALEM, KASIMKOTA MANDAL. (AMENDED US PE,R THE ORDERS OPHE COURT, DATED 26-08-2015 IN LA. NO. 1745/2010) ... RESPONDENT{S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1. PRABHAKAR SRIPADA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G RAMA GOPAL 2.
343/G RAMA GOPAL The Court made the following: Judgment: None represented for the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. Already the matter is coming under the caption “for dismissal”. Under the circumstances, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for its non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- E KAMESWARA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The II Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam (with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri Prabhakar Sripada, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri G Rama Gopal, Advocate [OPUC] A. P. at Amaravathi. 4. The Section Officer, V. R. Section, High Court of 5. Three CD Copies Ssl HIGH COURT DATED:25/04/2024 JUDGMENT AS. No. 356 of 2017 S 2 0 M4Y 20211 a Current Section DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS N
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.