ROSEBILLA CH. SANGMA v. THE GARO HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND 2 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2024-10-03. ROSEBILLA CH. SANGMA v. THE GARO HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND 2 ORS. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
Serial No. 02 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 351 of 2024 Date of Decision: 03. 10. 2024 Smti Rosebilla Ch. Sangma … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Represented by its Secretary, Executive Committee, West Garo Hills, Tura 2. The Chief Executive Member of Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura 3. The Secretary to the Executive Committee Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura … Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. T. Sangma, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Deb, Adv. with Ms. L. Langi, Adv. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc. : ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No (ORAL) 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the writ petitioner with a prayer for direction to release the pending bills of Rs.
9,25,300/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Twenty Five Thousand Three Hundred) only, which is stated to be the bills for the work allotted on 08. 12. 2016, for renovation of a Quarter No. 16, of the Garo Hills Autonomous District Council. 2. The petitioner apart from annexing a copy of the work order and a representation submitted on 05. 09. 2024, no other documents or materials have been annexed to the writ petition to show that there any certified bill that is payable, by the respondents. 3. Mr. S. Deb, learned counsel for the respondents also submits that nothing has been brought on record to show that there are any dues, payable by the Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, apart from the representation. 4. Looking into the materials as placed, as a representation has been received on 05. 09. 2024, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to attend to the representation, within 2(two) months. 5. The matter stands closed and is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE Meghalaya 03. 10. 2024 “V. Lyndem-PS” Signature Not Verified Page 3 of 3 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2024. 10. 03 17:29:19 IST
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.