Sandhireddy Srinivas Rao v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-22. Sandhireddy Srinivas Rao v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ 3303 l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENW SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO Between: 1- Sandhireddy srinivas Rao, s/o Venkatappaiah, Age: 37 years, occ: Business R/o savitrinagar, Maruthinagar, Road tto. z, Mancherial Diskict. N/o H. No. 7-235-A, Near veternary Hospital, saathuluru Nadhendta Mandal, Guntur District. 2. Gaddam Rathnaiah, s/o sangamaiah Age: so years, occ: Business, R/o- Flat No. 201, A-Block, Greenwood Apartment, Kianthinagar. Darganritta, Nellore District. ... Petitioners/Accused No. 1 & 2 AND 1. The state of relangana, Rep. by the pubric prosecutor High court at Hyderabad 2. A. Mahender Circle Inspector of police, Manthini, peddapalli District. ... Respondents/Gom plainants Petition under Section 528 of B. N. S. S.
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petitio;, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in cc. No. 621t2020 0n the file of the il Additional Judicial First class Magistrate at Macheriar, Mancheriar District. l. A. NO: I OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of B. N. S. S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminat Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in CC'No'62112020 on the file of the ll Additional Judiciat First Ctass Magistrate at Macherial, Mancherial District during the pendency of criminal. This Pr:tition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of C;riminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P. Animi Reddy, Advocate reprrsss.
ll^g Sri Harinath Reddy Soma, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramatla, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana ort behalf of the Respond'ent No. 1 and none appeared for Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER ') :n { A AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO C o. 1 Date: 22. 12. 2025 lJetween: Sandhireddy Srinivas Rao and another ... petitioners AND - -['he State of felangana, represented by public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad and another . respondents ORDER 'l'his criminal Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in c. c. No. 62l of 2020, on the file of It Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Mancherial, Mancherial f)istrict wherein the petitioners were arrayed as accused Nos. l and 2 for the offence punishable under Sections 420 of the lndian Penal code, 1860 (for short 'Ipc') and section 5 of Ap ('l-elangana Area) Money Lenders Act 1349. - 2. Heard Mr. P.
Animi Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr. Harinath Reddy Soma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jithendar Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Pubtic Prosecutor for respondent No. l. 3. Though the criminal petition was filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C. C. No. 62l of 2020, the learned counsel for the petitiont:rs restricted his prayer requesting this Court to dispense w'ith the appearance of the petitioners/accused Nos. l and 2 in c. C. No 621 of 2020, on the file of Il Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Mancherial. Mancherial District. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has not opposed the subrnission made by the learned counsel for petitioners. 5. [n view of the above submissions, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the presence of the petitioners/accused Nos. l and 2 in C. C. No.
62l of 2020, on the file of II Additional Judicial First class Magistrare at Mancherial, Maru;herial District is dispensed with, subject to the condition that the petitioners/accused Nos. t and 2 shall be represented by their counsel on every date of hearing, unless their presence is specifically required during the course of the trial. In the event of non-appearance of petitioners/accused Nos. l and 2 on any date so fixed by the trial Court, the trial Court shall be entitled to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd,- C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /,TRUE COPY" SECTION OFFICER To 1. ll Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at , Mancherial District. 2. The Station House Officer, Police Station MancherialTown, Ramagundam. 3. One CC to SRI HARINATH REDDY SOMA Advocate TOPUCI 4.
Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUTI 5. Two CD Copies BA &* I n HIGH COURT DATED: 22l,1212025 ]e. l-lHE S ( m CRLP. No. 17333 of 2025 L) a f * *' '*-7 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION KS zzl-fze ,
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.