Mohammed Abdul Mubeen v. The District Collector
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-29. Mohammed Abdul Mubeen v. The District Collector. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3183 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PET ITION NO: 1447 7 0F 2026 Between: MohammedAbdul Mubeen, S/o M_A. Majid, Aged about 49 years, Occ: Business, Ryo. 1-8-15, Street No. 8, Ravindra Nagai Coto-ny, Habsigudi, Hyderabad. ,.... PETITIONER AND 1 . The Diskict Collector, Sanga Reddy Diskict. 2. The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Dvisional Officer, Andole_Jogipet Division, Sanga Reddy District. 4. The Tahsildar, pulkal Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. ..... RESPONDENTS Petition Under Nticre 226 0f the constitution of rndia pralng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue any writ, order or direction more particurarry one in , the nature of wRIT oF MANDAMUS decraring the action of the Respondents No 3 and.
4 in initiating and proceeding with steps to alter/change the revenue entries in petitione/s agricultural lands in Sy. Nos. 112, 115, 116, 117, 11g, 12O, 121, 122, 127, 14O, 148, 151, 153, 154, 156, 157, 163, 164, 166, 169, 170, . t72, 171 , 173, 174, 175, 178, 17g, 182, 185, 186, 193, 1 95, 196, 795, 803 situated at Gongloor Village, putkat Mandat, Sanga Reddy District on basis of the notices dated 1b-04-2026 without folowing due process of raw as iflegar, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of rerangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Acr, 2o2s and Rures, 2o2s, and vioration of articles 14,21 and 300-4 of constitution of rndia and consequenfly direct the Respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner s representation dated 1 1 - 1 1- 2025 in accordance with law. I. A.
NO:1 OF 2026 '151 Petition Under Section CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to lhe notices dated 15-04-2026 issued by Respondent No. 4 in respect of the petitioner's agricultural lands in Sy. Nos. 112, 115, 116, 117,119, 120, 121 ,122, 127,140, 148, 151,153, 154, 156,157,163,. 164, 166, 169, 170, 171,172, 173, 174, 175, 178, 179, 182, 185, 186, 193, 195, 196, 795, 803 situated at Gongldor Village, Pulkal Mandal, Sanga Reddy District, pending disposal of main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI S. M. SAIFULLAH Gounsel for the Respondents : SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER i/ . l HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAIIGANA ATHYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITON No . 14477 0B 2026 DA TE:29-04-2026 Between: Mr. Mohd. Abdul Mubeen ... Petitioner AND The State ofTelangana Rep.
By its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others. ... Respondents ORDER: (ORAL) Heard Mr. S. M. Saifullah, learned counsel for the petitioner, for and Mr. L. Ravinder, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader Revenue, appearing for respondents. for Revenue has 2. Learned Assistant Govemment Pleader of writ petition taken preliminary objection to the maintainability under Ex'Pl were and submitted that notices dated 08. 04'2026 and others on the issued to the petitioner, f"uily members application submitted by third parties seeking regularization of their land in subject survey numbers situated at Gongloor Village, Pulkal Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. Thar, instead of submitting explanation to the impugned notices petitioner filed this writ petition without any legal basis. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that alleged sadabainama.
/unregistered sale deeds based on which applications were filed under Rule 6(2) of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Rules 2025 (for shorr. Rules 2025,) are fake documents. petitioner was already issued pattadar passbook in respect of the lands in subject survey numbers, hence, question of regularizing the land covered by the pattadar pass book does not arise. It is submitted that petitioner submitted representation dated 11. 11. 2025 to respondent No. 4 to cancel the sadabainamas and not to pass any orders on the regularization applications submitted by third parties in respect of the land in subject survey numbers situated at Gongloor Village, pulkal Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. 4. In the light of above submissions, considering that 7,' J applications for regularization of sadabainama.
/unregistered documents have been submitted by third parties and notices have been issued to the petitioner and others under Rule 6(2) of the Rules 2025, assuming that petitioner was issued pattadar pass book, it cannot be said that applications for regularization cannot be entertained. It is not as if respondent No. 3 is not having any jurisdiction to issue the impugned notices. The contention of leamed counsel for the petitioner that sadabainamas/unregistered sale deeds are fake documents is a matter to be decided by respondent No. 3 in the enquiry. 5. In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to submit explanation to the impugned notices dated 08. 04. 2026 issued by week respondent No. 3 within a period of one ( I from today. On ) receipt ofsuch explanation, respondent No. 3 is directed to consider the same, and pass orders, in accordance with law, by affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, applicants, and all other concemed/interested persons.
\ 6 With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed. Sd/. AHMED ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (7 SECTION OFFICER To 1 . The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District. 2. The Diskict Collector, Sanga Reddy Oistrict. a Divisionat Officer, Andote-Jogipet Division, Sanga Reddy l[:r,5"r""ue 4. The Tahsildar, pulkal Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. 5. Two CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE,-Hi'n C6r,t-foiine Srate of Tetangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 6. One CC to SRI S. M. SAIFULLAH, Advocate [OpUC] 7. Two CD Copies SA d C. C. TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 2910412026 _ ,__r\ a '*, s" ORDER <:: WP. No. 14a77 of 2otd DISPOSING OF THE W. P WITHOUT COSTS. OI 0
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.