Kurakula Nagaraju v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-11-21. Kurakula Nagaraju v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
132s7 ) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14063 OF 2024 Between: 1. Kurakula Nagaraju, S/o. K. Saraiah, Age. 34, Occ. Private Employee, R/o. Dharmaram Villa, Nadikuda Mandal, Warangal. 2. Pallakonda Nagarvarsha, S/o. P. Raju, Age. 26, Occ. Private Employee, R/o. Dharmaram Villa, Nadikuda Mandal, Warangal. 3. Kurakula Swathi, W/o. K. Saraiah, Age. 24, Occ. Private Employee, Rio. Dharmaram Villa, Nadikuda Mandal, Warangal. 4. Kurakula Aravind, Sio. K. Saraiah, Age. 28, Occ. Private Employee,R/o. Dharmaram Villa, Nadikuda Mandal, Warangal. 5. Pallakonda Suraiah, S/o. P. Samaiah, Age. 50, Occ. Farmer, R/o. Dharmaram Villa, Nadikuda Mandal, Warangal. 6. Pallakonda Ralitha, Wo. P. Samaiah, Age. 45, Occ. Household,R/o. Dharmaram Villa, Nadikuda Mandal, Warangal. 7. Kurakula Pushpamma, Wo. K. Saraiah, Age. 50, Occ.
Household, R/o. Dharmaram Villa, Nadikuda Mandal, Warangal. 8. Kurakula Saraiah, S/o. K. Yellaiah, Age. 55, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Dharmaram Villa, Nadikuda Mandal, Warangal. ... PETITIONER/APPELLANTS AND 1. The State of Telangana, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT 2. Smt. Kumbal Swetha, Wo. Kurakula Nagaraju, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Housewife, Rlo. 4-7-226117lCLR Vikarabad Town, Mandal and District. ... DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of B. N. S. S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records connected to Crime No. 41 of 2024 registered by WPS Vikarabad,vikarabad and quash the same. l. A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under section 492 of cr. p. c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminir Fetition, the High C;;rt .
ry be pleas;ed to srAY alr further proceedings incruding the arrest of tie petitioners in connection with crime No. 41 of 2ozZ in registered by wpS Vikaiabad ps, Vikarabad District. T;ris Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds; of criminar petition and upon hlaring the arguments of sri vrJAy B PAROP,\KAR| ,Advocate for the petition", ,ni sri Jrthender Rao Veeiamatta, the Additional prosecutor -r. ro. Pubric (TG) on beharf of the Respondeni i none appeared for the Respondent No. "no The Court made the following: ORDER I HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI 'I-ION CRIMINAL PITI No. 14063 of 2024 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of the ,BNSS,) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short by the petitione rs/a ccu sed Nos. 1 to 8, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Cr. No.
4l- of 2024 of WpS Vikarabad, Vikarabad District, registered for the offences punishable g5 under Sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for short 'BNS'). 2. Heard learned counsel representing petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional public prosecutor appearing for the State. Perused the record. 3 Though this petition is filed for quashing the proceedings in the I crime, I during the course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners has sought for directions to police the to proceed with Bharatiya invr:stigation by issuing notice under Section 35(3) of of Cr'P'C Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) (Previously Section 41-A ) merits of the case, 4. ln view of the above, without going into this crirninal petition is disposed of directing the Police concerned to proceed with the investigation in the above crime after issuing notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS (Previously Section 41-A of Cr'P'C') to the petitioners/accused Nos.
1 to 8 and they shall also follow the guidelines of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v' State of Bihar and anotherl. The petitioners shall co-operate with the in'restigating officer in concluding the investigation Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed Sd/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' N\i N SECTION OFFICER To, llhestationHouseOfficer,WomenPoliceStation,Vikarabad'Vikarabad District. Z. One CC to SRI VIJAY B PAROPAKARI, Advocate [OPUC] public Prosecutor, High Court fof the State of Telangana at 5, f*o CCs to Hyderabad[OUT] 4. Two CD Copies AR/gh ly 't i: q It I "t HIGH CoURT DATED:2111112O24 5 r4 11-rt ( ,t ORDER i a I 2m z (. , sa t:i, t a CRLP. No. 14063 ot 2024 Ku,, t D6s n A. T DISPOSING OF THE CRL. P. fr + /r tt\&t'
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.