Khushlal Sahni v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2024-12-19. Khushlal Sahni v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 87188 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -74 Year-2023 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. Khushlal Sahni S/O Kantu Sahni R/O- Village- Nizamat, Bhatsimar, P. S. - Rajnagar, District- Madhubani. 2. Raso Devi W/O Kantu Sahni R/O- Village- Nizamat, Bhatsimar, P. S. - Rajnagar, District- Madhubani. 3. Kantu Sahni @ Kantulal Sahni S/O Fussi Sahni R/O- Village- Nizamat, Bhatsimar, P. S. - Rajnagar, District- Madhubani. 4. Mangal Sahni @ Ranjeet Sahni S/O Late Panchu Sahni R/O- Village- Nizamat, Bhatsimar, P. S. - Rajnagar, District- Madhubani. 5. Gauliya Devi @ Golia Devi W/O Late Panchu Sahni R/O- Village- Nizamat, Bhatsimar, P. S. - Rajnagar, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 2 19-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 143, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 448, 354(A), 504, 506 of IPC. 3. The allegation against the petitioners is that they assaulted the informant side with bamboo fatta, iron rod and farsa. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 87188 of 2024(2) dt. 19-12-2024 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. There is a case and counter case between the parties.
He further submits that co-accused Anup Sahani and Saroj Sahani assaulted the injured person and injury was found simple in nature, no specific allegation alleged against rest of the petitioners. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the fact that the injury was simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Rajnagar P. S. Case No. 74 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Suruchi/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.