SMT. ZAKIR UNNISA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: R DEVDAS
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-21. SMT. ZAKIR UNNISA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 5413 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ST DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 5413 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ZAKIR UNNISA W/O S. K. MAHABOOB, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO. 10, 1ST CROSS, SAMBHRAM COLLEGE, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, M. S. PALYA, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097. 2. SRI. SHET S/O P. PUTTARADA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, SAMBHRAM COLLEGE, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, M. S. PALYA, VIDYARANYAPURA, Digitally signed by JUANITA BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097. THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF 3. SRI. C. NAGAPPA KARNATAKA S/O CHINASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO. 24, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, SAMBHRAM COLLEGE, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, M. S. PALYA, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097. - 2 - WP No. 5413 of 2026 4. SRI. APSAR PASHA, S/O M. ABDUL SATHAR, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, NO.
06, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, CHIKKABETTAHALLI, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097. 5. SRI. PRABHU RASAPPAN S/O RASAPPAN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, NO. 14, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, M. S. PALYA, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097. 6. SRI. SASI KUMAR S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, NO. 14, SAMBHRAM COLLEGE, RAJIV GANDHI COLONY, M. S. PALYA, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097. 7. SRI. MOHAMMED JAMSHEED D. S/O MOHAMMED DASTAGIR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, NO. 14, SAMBHRAM COLLEGE, RAJIV GANDHI COLONY, MS PALYA, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097. 8. SRI. SYED SHAFIULLA S/O SYED DASTAGIRI SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, NO. 21, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, - 3 - WP No. 5413 of 2026 CHIKKABETTAHALLI, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560097. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KEMPE GOWDA C. M, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K. G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. 4. THE LAND GRANT COMMITTEE, REP. BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. 5. THE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA SLUM BOARD, SESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 020. 6. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER 4TH SUB-DIVISION, NO. 55, - 4 - WP No. 5413 of 2026 RISALDAR STREET, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 020. 7. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, YELAHANKA SUB-DIVISION, BBMP/GBA, NEAR GANGAMMA TEMPE, BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS GIVEN BY THE PRESIDENT MR. S. MANJUNATH, DR. B. R.
AMBEDKAR SUVARNA KARNATAKA KARMIKE VEDIKE, ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS AND OTHERS AND TO ISSUE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE TO THEIR RESPECTIVE HOUSES AS PER ANNEXURE-Q AND ETC. , THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Notice to the other respondents is not necessary for the following reasons. - 5 - WP No. 5413 of 2026 2. Although the prayer in the writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to consider the representation at Annexure-Q, learned Additional Government Advocate points out that the representation at Annexure-Q is given by 'Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Suvarna Karnataka Karmikara Vedike' and not by the petitioners. It is submitted that no specific information regarding the petitioners is forthcoming from the representations. 3.
Upholding the submissions of the learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition stands disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to give representation to the competent authority to consider the grievances of the petitioners. Ordered accordingly. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv, Sl No. : 1
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.