RAJESH @ SUSIL NAIK @ SUSHIL NAIK v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2026-04-08. RAJESH @ SUSIL NAIK @ SUSHIL NAIK v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK Rajesh @ Susil Naik @ Sushil Naik (In BLAPL No. 1562 2026) Gunu @ Akhila Naik (In BLAPL No. 1986 of 2026) … Petitioners Mr. S. S. Dash, Advocate (In BLAPL No. 1562 of 2026) Ms. P. Das, proxy counsel along with Mr. R. Ghosh, Advocate (In BLAPL No. 1986 of 2026) -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. M. R. Patra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER(ORAL):08. 04. 2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. Since these two bail applications arise out of one and same case record, the same are heard together and disposed of by this common order with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. These are applications U/S. 483 of BNSS by the petitioners for grant of bail in connection with Colliery P. S. Case No. 604 of 2025 corresponding to GR(Cog. ) Case No. 1317 of 2025 pending in the file of learned JMFC(CT), Talcher for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.
309(4)/317(2)/3(5) of BNS, on the main allegation of snatching away ear ring and gold chain from the informant. 4. Heard Mr. Sudhansu Sekahar Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL Nos. 1562 of 2026; Ms. Pratyusha Das, learned proxy counsel along with Mr. Ronit Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No. 1986 of 2026 and Mr. M. R. Patra, learned Addl. PP in the matter and perused the record. 5. After having considered the rival submissions upon perusal of record, FIR appears to have been lodged against three unknown persons, but no TI parade has been conducted to identify the suspects, however, in the meantime, charge sheet has already been submitted. In such view of the matter and taking into account the materials so placed on record and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the petitioners in custody since 07. 11. 2025/19. 11.
2025 with submission of charge-sheet in the meantime and keeping in view the other circumstance on record in entirety, this Court without expressing any view on merit admits the petitioners to bail. 6. Hence, these two bail applications of the petitioners namely Rajesh @ Susil Naik @ Sushil Naik(In BLAPL No. 1562 of 2026) and Gunu @ Akhila Naik (In BLAPL No. 1986 of 2026) are allowed and each of the petitioners is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with one solvent surety each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following condition:- (i) the petitioners shall appear before the IIC of the concerned local Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on a Sunday in each month in between 10 A. M. to 12 Noon for six (06) months from the actual date of release from the custody.
The IIC of the Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioners unnecessarily after recording their attendance beyond the time as stipulated. 7. Accordingly, both the BLAPLs stand disposed of. 8. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference. (G. Satapathy) Judge kishore
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.