GABRIEL K. IANGRAI v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2024-10-29. GABRIEL K. IANGRAI v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 09 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 166 of 2024 Date of Decision: 29. 10. 2024 Shri. Gabriel K. Iangria, MPS …Petitioner -Versus 1. State of Meghalaya through the Chief Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. The Chief Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Home Department, Shillong. 3. The Director General of Police, Meghalaya, Shillong. 4. The Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Home Department, Shillong. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. Philemon Nongbri, Adv. Mr. W. G. R. Mihsill, Adv. Mr. R. Pahsyntiew, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. D. Chullai, AAG with Ms. Z. E. Nongkynrih, GA. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. N. D. Chullai, learned AAG assisted by Ms. Z. E.
Nongkynrih, learned GA submits that the documents which have been sought by the writ petitioner as indicated in their rejoinder affidavit dated 04-09-2024, wherein at Annexure-3 thereof, the said documents appearing at Sl. No. 4 and 6, the documents are under investigation and the copies have since been provided to the charged Officer under Section 207 CrPC. 2. With regard to Sl. No. 10 which the petitioner has submitted are copies of all the stock register which has not been furnished, it is reported that these materials have been seized by the Investigation Officer and the details are to be verified. Mr. N. D. Chullai, learned AAG further submits it is not known if these documents are part of the case itself. 3. Mr. Philemon Nongbri, learned counsel has also submitted that in the meanwhile the examination of all the witnesses has since been concluded. 4. In this view of the matter, nothing survives for consideration in the present case, as such, the same is closed and disposed of.
Judge Signature Not Verified 3 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2024. 10. 29 17:25:10 IST
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.