GUMANSINGH v. NAANLA AND 7 ORS.
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. GUMANSINGH v. NAANLA AND 7 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL VERMA nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 SECOND APPEAL No. 691 of 2011 BETWEEN:- GUMANSINGH S/O BALU BHILALA, AGED ABOUT 60 Y E A R S , OCCUPATION: AGRICULTRIST, R/O AAGALLGOT, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT ALIRAJPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPELLANT (NONE FOR THE APPELLANT) AND 1. NAANLA AND 7 ORS. S/O ANSINGH BHILALA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O GRAM AKLU, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT ALIRAJPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. KEKDIYA S/O CHIMALIYA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICL. , R/O GRAM AKLU, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT ALIRAJPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. MANA S/O KUCHIYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O AKLU, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT ALIRAJPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. SMT. DANI W/O LATE KUCHIYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEAR S , R / O AKLU, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT ALIRAJPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. PAATALIA S/O BUDHIYA , AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R / O AKLU, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT ALIRAJPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 6.
INDRIYA S/O KUCHIYA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R / O AKLU, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT ALIRAJPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 7. SMT. NURLI W/O RUPLA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O AMBARI, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT ALIRAJPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) Signature Not Verified Signed by: TEJPRAKASH Signing time: 2/3/2024 10:46:17 AM 8. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, DISTRICT ALIRAJPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (R. NO. 8 BY SHRI AMIT RAVAL - GOVT. ADVOCATE) This appeal coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER From perusal of the earlier order sheets, it reveals that nobody marked appearance on behalf of the appellant on earlier occasions i. e. on 12/09/2019, 18/10/2019 and 13/03/2020. Today also nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant. This repeated non-appearance of the appellant for last five years is sufficient to show that the appellant has lost its interest in prosecuting this second appeal, therefore, the second appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
Let record of both the Courts below be sent back to the concerned Court along with copy of this order. (ANIL VERMA) JUDGE Tej Signature Not Verified Signed by: TEJPRAKASH Signing time: 2/3/2024 10:46:17 AM
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.