S.Durga Prasad v. K.Padmnabham
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: G SRI DEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-31. S.Durga Prasad v. K.Padmnabham. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD DAY OF DECEIVBER THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT G SRI DEVI THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE 2014 CIVIL REVIS ION PETITIO N NO: 4661 OF PetitionunderArticle22TofConstitutionoflndia,aggrievedbytheorderdated 0f 0n the file of the court of the 18tO7l2o14in lA No. 212 0f 2014 in oS No. B77 2013 XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad' Between: occ: Hotel Business, [vl/s Bhavani s Duroa Prasad. s/o s. Janardhan Age. 49 years, jo:-s-ioaor+, at Kachisuda Xtoad. 6"'iirilu. '. n. t EX? ;f3;3*rENr/ DEFENDANT AND l. K. Padmnabham,S/olateK. V'Pandharinath,Age:58years,occ:PrivateService, R/o H. No. 4-2-1035, Ramkote, Hyderabad' House wife' R/o H No 4-z. X. Raieshwari, Wlo raie k. iirihatir, nge:+g years, Occ: 2-1 035, Ramkote, Hyderabad. s k. Rr"irdi;nig,, sl,j iate K V Pandharinath, Age:50 years' occ: Business' -nio H No:-5-1030/4, Kachiguda X Road, Hyderabad occ: Teacher' 4 K S;. b;;rr, olo late K.
VlPandharinath, Age:58 vears' g-S-1030/4, Road, Hyderabad' nlo'H No Kachiguda X ... RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS CRPMP. NO: 6380 0F 2014 in Petition under 151 of section cPC praying that in the circumstances stated High may be pleased to stay the operations of the affidavit filed therewith, the court Chief ol 2013 on the file of XXV Additional order in tA No. 2'12 ol zo14 in oS ilo. 877 such other order or orders' Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad and pass Advocate For the Petitioner : SRI P. GlRl KRISHNA, FortheReSpondentNos. lto4:SRIBETHIVENKATESWARLU'Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CIVIT- ttEV]SI()N PETII' ION N(). -166 I ()1. - 201+ ORDER: Learned counsel h. rr thc petitioner u,or_rlcl subntit that llt( . iIrsc ]n tlris ri'r'isior-r cl. r's noI srrr-r'i''r,]irrtlrrr iLrijLrrlicati,n . Lncl tlr,, rcr. ision has be come infructuous In that I'ieu of the matter, recorcling the said submission.
thc, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as inl'ructuons. There shalr bc no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if anv, pending shall stancl d ismissed. Sd/. K. AMI\,4AJI i ASSISTANT REGIS R i //TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Chairman, XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. (with records) One CC to Sri P. G jri Krishna, Advocate (OPUC) 3. One CC to Sri Bethi Venkateshwarlu, Advocate'(OpUC) 4. Two CD Copies Kj r^\\- HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212020 1EL. $ 6. \,/ * rl- c ti e, s"-o C) {p" ,f ( 3 ,l ORDER li CRP. No. 4661 of 2014 Dismissing the CRP as infructuous without costs. (a') V.... \2' r\. {rX
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.