SRI HANUMA BHOVI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: R DEVDAS
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-24. SRI HANUMA BHOVI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 19354 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19354 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI HANUMA BHOVI S/O. LATE KALA BHAOVI AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT AGRAHARA VILLAGE, DODDAMAGGE HOBLI, ARAKALAGUDU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANIKANTA H B. , ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA by JUANITA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDING, THEJESWINI DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, Location: HIGH COURT OF BENGALURU 560 001, KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN-573201. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ARAKALAUGUDU TALUK, ARAKALAGUDU, HASSAN DISTRICT-573102. - 2 - WP No. 19354 of 2025 4. THE TAHASILDAR ARAKALAGUDU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573102. 5. SRI. ANDANI SHETTY, S/O LATE NINGANASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 6. SRI VIJAYENDRA S/O LATE NINGANASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 7.
SRI GOVINDEGOWDA S/O SUBBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 8. SMT NAGAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 9. SRI RAJEGOWDA S/O SANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 10. SRI N S PRADEEP S/O SANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO. 5 TO 10 ARE R/AT AGRAHARA VILLAGE, DODDAMAGGE HOBLI, ARAKALAHUDU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK. , HCGP FOR R1 TO R4) - 3 - WP No. 19354 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02. 12. 2024 IN REVISION PETITION NO. 127/2023-24 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. , THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 10. 04. 2026, the following order was passed: “Finally, two weeks' time is granted for compliance of office objections. If office objections are not complied, list this matter for dismissal on 24. 04. 2026.
” 2. Till today, office objections have not been complied with. 3. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.