RAJENDRA MEHTA v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. RAJENDRA MEHTA v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 13030 of 2022 BETWEEN:- RAJENDRA MEHTA S/O SHREE HIRALAL MEHTA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: GOVERNMENT SERVICE, R/O NEAR PATIDAR DHARAMSHALA. KHARSOD KHURD, BARNAGAR, UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI NITIN SINGH BHATI, ON BEHALF OF SHRI REVAT SINGH RAGHUVANSHI, ADVOCATE. ) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. C O L L E C T O R , UJJAIN, DISTRICT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. C E O , JANPAD PANCHAYAT, BARNAGAR, DISTRICT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI SUDHANSHU VYAS, PANEL LAWYER. ) T h is petition coming on for orders this day, t h e cou rt passed the following: ORDER 01.
The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking direction to the respondent to grant the benefit of first and second time pay-scale as granted to him vide order dated 14. 02. 2011. According to the petitioner, though the order Signature Not Verified Signed by: DIVYANSH Signing time: 02-02-2024 18:22:59 has been passed but the monetary benefit has not been extended to him till date. 02. The respondent file the reply that the petitioner is still on probation after appointment on 15. 09. 1987. Since the probation period has not come to an end, therefore, all the financial benefits are held up. According to the respondent, the petitioner has not applied for confirmation of probation to the State Government. 03. For confirmation of any employee, no application is required for the employer to consider his service record and pass an order of confirmation or extension of probation period.
The petitioner is working since 1987, he completed more than 30 years of service and still his probation period has not come to an end. 04. In view of the above, let this issue of confirmation of present petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of 4 weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Thereafter, his claim for grant of all monetary benefits be considered and granted. 05. With the aforesaid, Writ Petition stands disposed of. Certified copy, as per rules. (VIVEK RUSIA) JUDGE Divyansh Signature Not Verified Signed by: DIVYANSH Signing time: 02-02-2024 18:22:59
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.