SMT. SAHIDA BEGUM LASKAR v. THE UNION OF INDIA and 7 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-08. SMT. SAHIDA BEGUM LASKAR v. THE UNION OF INDIA and 7 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010010362016 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1434/2016 SMT. SAHIDA BEGUM LASKAR W/O- LT. MD. FAKURUDDIN LASKAR, PRESENTLY RESIDED AT QUARTER NO. 1, NHPC COLONY, SUBANSIRI, LOWER HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT, P. O. - GERUAMUKH, DIST. - DHEMAJI, ASSAM AND PERMANENT R/O VILL. - BANSKANDI PART- II, P. O. - BANSKANDI, P. S. - LAKHIPUR, DIST. - CACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA and 7 ORS REP. BY THE SECY. , MINISTRY OF POWER, NEW DELHI. 2:THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION FARIDABAD HARYANA. 3:THE GENERAL MANAGER MEDICAL NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION FARIDABAD HARYANA. 4:THE CHIEF HR ESTT. NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION FARIDABAD HARYANA. 5:THE CHIEF P-HR-III NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION FARIDABAD HARYANA. 6:THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR H. R. DEPTT. Page No.
# 2/2 SUBHANSIRI LOWER HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. GERUAMUKH VIA GOGAMUKH DIST. - DHEMAJI ASSAM. 7:THE CHIEF ENGINEER H. R. DEPTT. SUBHANSIRI LOWER HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. GERUKAMUKH VIA GOGAMUKH DIST. - DHEMAJI ASSAM. 8:THE DY. MANAGER M TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION NO. 1 LOKTAK H. E. PROJECT MANIPUR Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M R HAZARIKA Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT. S. G. I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN ORDER 08. 12. 2020 Heard Mr. A. Y. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S. S. Roy, learned counsel representing respondent no. 1. Mr. R. K. D. Choudhury, learned counsel appears for respondent nos. 2 to 8. Mr. A. Y. Choudhury fairly submits that due to subsequent development in the case, the writ petition has become infructuous. On his prayer, this writ petition stands dismissed as being rendered infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.