THENKUMAR v. State rep by the Inpsector of Police
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2025-11-18. THENKUMAR v. State rep by the Inpsector of Police. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Crl. O. P. No. 31417 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18. 11. 2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Crl. O. P. No. 31417 of 2025 Thenkumar ... Petitioner -vs- State Rep by, Station House Officer, Pudupettai Police Station, Cuddalore District. (Crime No. 306 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 306 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : M/S. D. Lakshmipathy For Respondent : Mr. A. Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ********** 1/5 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis Crl. O. P. No. 31417 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21. 09. 2025, for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 103(1) of BNS altered to section 103(1) and 238 of BNS in Crime No. 306 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.
The allegation against the petitioner is that, the petitioner is ranked as A2 in this case and while this petitioner consuming liquor with other accused, the deceased also joined with them and there was a quarrel taken place between them. Hence this petitioner and other accused, attacked him and also stabbed him by using knife. Thereafter, they also tied his body and dumped in the nearby pond. Hence, the complaint was registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner is in custody from 21. 09. 2025 and the major part of the investigation concluded and there are no eye witness to the occurrence. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 2/5 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis Crl. O. P. No. 31417 of 2025 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) reported that there are witnesses connecting the accused with the occurrence and he further submitted that both the accused were arrested and the investigation is not concluded.
He further submitted that there are no bad antecedents against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. I have considered the submissions made on both sides and perused the records. The facts revealed that it is not only a case of murder but it is also screening of offence. The petitioner has stabbed the deceased and after his death, the petitioner tied his body with stone and dumped the dead body in the nearby pond. Hence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 18. 11. 2025 mpa To 1. Station House Officer, Pudupettai Police Station, Cuddalore District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 3/5 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis Crl. O. P. No. 31417 of 2025 K. RAJASEKAR, J. mpa Crl. O. P. No. 31417 of 2025 4/5 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis Crl. O. P. No. 31417 of 2025 18. 11. 2025 5/5 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.