Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Ms. PSS Constructions v. The State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-29. Ms. PSS Constructions v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

\ [ I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO (Speciat Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 8400 OF 2026 Between: Ms. PSS Constructions, Rep. by its Managing Partner Sri Pilli Ratna Prasad,S/o Kotaiah, Aged 52 years, Occ: Business, Fl/o Plot No. 106, Mahadevapuram Enclave, Chintal/Jeedimetla (Capularamuram), Quthbullapur Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, Telangana PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, State of Telangana 2. The District Collector, Medchal Malkajgiri, State of Telangana. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, , Malkajgiri Division, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri, State of Telangana 4. TheTahsildar and Jt. Sub Registrar, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, State of Telangana 5.

The Mandal Surveyor, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, State of Telangana. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be plilased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents 2 to 5 in not considering the petitioner's F-Line / Demarcation application Dated 05-04-2024 bearing Transaction lD No. TTAOD022400061989 and Application No. AOD022400061989 submitted through Meeseva for conducting survey in Sy. No. 172115, Hydenagar Village, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana as illegal and arbitrary and violative of Article 2'1 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to considering the petitioneas F-Line / Demarcation application Dated 05-04-2024 bearing Transaction lD No. TTA0D022400061989 and Application No.

AOD022400061989 submitted through MeeSeva for conducting survey in Sy. No. 172l15, Hydernagar Village, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana in the interest of justice. l. A. NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to considering the petitioner's F-Line / Demarcation application Dated 05-04-2024 bearing Transaction lD No. TTA0D022400061989 and Application No AOD022400061989 submitted through MeeSeva for conducting survey in Sy. No 1 72l15, Hydernagar Village, Kukatpalty Mandal, Medchal-Matkajgiri Dishict, Telangana pending disposal of the writ petition, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BYRAPAKA ANAND KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER r-) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA t\ AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.

VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 84OO of 2O26 Dated: 29. O4. 2O26 Between Ms. PSS Constructions PETITIONER And The State of Telangana. Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad and others. ... RESPONDENTS ORDER The writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents No. 2 to 5 in not considering the petitioner's F-Line / Demarcation application dated 05. 04. 2024 bearing Transaction ID. No. TTA0D0224OOO6I989 and Application No. A0D022400061989 submitted through Meeseva for conducting survey in Sy. No. 172l15, Hydernagar Village, Kukatpally Mandal, t Medchal-Malkajgiri District, as being, illegal and arbitrary and \ violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. . fr x 3. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue submitted that the request of the petitioner seeking survey of residentia I plots cannot be considered.

In similar circumstances, this Court passed order dated 14. 10. 2024 in Wp. No. 2 Bl24 of 2024, wherein the writ petition was dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner therein to take the services of licensed surveyor for conducting survey of open plots. Learned Assistant Government Pleader further submitted that the Government has issued Circular No. N2/7741/2010 dated 1g. 05. 2010 stating conduct of demarcation in respect of prots and part of rand in one survey number cannot be don e. 4. Recording the aforesaid submissions, the writ petition is disposed of giving lrberty to the petitioner to take the services of licensed surveyor for conducting the survey of its property. if they are so advised. The miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as costs. - _tL. _- Sd/. L.

VIJAYA LAXMI - ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, State of Telangana 2. The District Coltector, Medchal Malkajgiri, State of Telangana. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Malkajgiri Division, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Mallajgiri State of Telangana ,# T 4. TheTahsildar and Jt. Sub Registrar, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, State of Telangana \ 5. The Mandal Surveyor, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, State of Telangana. 6. One CC to SRI BYRAPAKA ANAND KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 8. Two CD Copies PMK bs g =--... -- HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED: 2910412026 I I ,4 6;itiTri,:>\ /;4, ORDER 7. :r. - l. J ),]lj ti 3[ AI)P WP. No. 8400 of 2026 a;. , :! . , DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS - -+aEr

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.