Sri H. Shankar v. The Government of Telangana and 6 others
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-02-05. Sri H. Shankar v. The Government of Telangana and 6 others. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY CIVtL REVISION PETITION NO: 2873 OF 2022 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Order and Decree made in 1. A. No. 708 of 2O17 in O. S. No. 243 of 2013 dated 24. 08. 2022 on the file of the XIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad. Between: Sri H. Shankar, S/o. Vittal, aged 42 years, Occ Contractor, R/o. H. No. 260, Ganga Sthan - 2, Armoor Road, Nizamabad. ... PETITIONER/PLAI NTI FF AND 1. The Government of Telangana, Represented by the District Collector of Nizamabad, Collector Office, Khaleelwadi, Nizamabad. 2. The State Government of Telangana, T. S. Education and Welfare lnfrastructure Development Corporation, lV Floor, RV[/ Building, SC and ERT Campus, Opp E Gate of Lalbahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, T. S.
, represented by its The Superintendent of Engineer. 3. The State Government of Telangana, T. S. Education and Welfare lnfrastructure Development Corporation, lV Floor, RV[/ Building, SC and ERT Campus,Opp. E Gate of Lalbahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad T. S. , represented by its Chief Engineer. 4. The Executive Engineer, office of Telangana State Education and Welfare lnfrastructure Development Corporation, 6-2-213, Near R Building, Subhasnagar, Nizamabad, Represented by its the Executive Engineer. 5. The State Government of Telangana, T. S'. Education and Welfare lnfrastructure Development Corporation, lV Floor, RVM Building, SC and ERT Campus, Opp. E Gate of Lalbahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, T. S. , represented by its The Assistant Engineer Sri. Pratap. 6. Sri. Pratap, Assistant Engineer of T. S. Education and Welfare lnfrastructure Development Corporation, lV Floor, RVIvI Building, SC and ERT Campus, Opp. E Gate of Lalbahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, T. S.
7. The Executive Engineer, office of T. S. Education and Welfare lnfrastructure Development Corporation, 6-2-213, Near R Building, Subhasnagar, N iza m ab a d, re p resented bv its H ead o rattSg. gb [tsEfl,fS,fl. * DAN rs = lA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition underSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the suit proceedings in O. S. No. 243 of 2013 on the file of XIV Additional Chief Judge Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the suit is posted forevidence on 07-12- 2022 and without the documents I have called for. ln fact I am relying on these documents to prrove the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2(t22 Petition uncjer Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to furnish the documents called for in the suit proceedings in O. S. No.
243 of 2013 on the file of XIV Additional Chief Judge Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the suit is posted for evidence on 07-12-2022 and without the documents I herve called for. ln fact I am relying on these documents to prove the CASC. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G. SUDHA Counsel for the Respondents : --- The Court macle the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THB HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY C. R. P. No. 2873 of 2022 Date:0l. 02. 2026 Between: Mr. H. Shankar. ... Petitioner AND The Governrnent of Telangana, Represented by the District Collector of Nizamabad, Collector Office, Khaleelwadi, Nizamabad and 6 others. ... Respondents \ ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 24. 08. 2022 passed in I. A. No. 708 of 2017 in O. S. No . 243 of ZAll3, on the file of learned XIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad. 2. Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner. 3.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of the Court that the suit in O. S. No. 243 of 2013 on the file of ) learned XIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad has already been disposed of vide judgment and decree dated 08. 01 . 202c,. 4. In view of the above developrnent, cause in the present civil revision petition no longer survives for further adjudication. 5. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuour;. There shall be no order as to costs. Mis<:ellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, 1. The XIV Additional Chief Judge Court, City Court, Hyderabad 2. One CC to Smt. G. Sudha,Advocale ' IOPUC) 3. Two CD Copies ks /PSL M / ,l HIGH COIURT DATED:0 510212026 t 'f HE U rA ( () 7 18 ItrH m26 ORDER * * CRP. No. 2873 of 2022 Dismissing the CRP as infructuous. Without costs. \ \ ")/ ? e
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.