RAMA SHARMA v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2025-10-30. RAMA SHARMA v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15237/2025 Decided on: 30. 10. 2025 Rama Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of H. P. & Ors. . …Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L. N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Seeking applicability of Madan Lal & Ors. Vs. State 2 of H. P. & Anr. as affirmed in State of H. P. & Ors. Vs. Madan Lal 3 & Ors. , petitioner seeks decision of his representation dated 23. 09. 2024 (Annexure P-6) for refund of the amount alleged to have been wrongly recovered from him pursuant to a recovery notice dated 19. 01. 2012, which was statedly deposited by the petitioner on 18. 03. 2015. The writ record shows that the present petitioner was one of the petitioners in Inder Singh Bhardwaj & Ors. Vs.
State of Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes CWPOA No. 7531/2019 decided on 30. 12. 2022 LPA No. 254/2023 decided on 27. 12. 2023 H. P. & Ors. instituted for directing the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid decisions. The said petition was disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners in light of decisions rendered in 2 5 Madan Lal as also S. S. Chaudhary Vs. State of H. P. & Ors . The issue of recovery of monetary benefits was also dealt with in Inder 4 Singh Bhardwaj . Respondents were directed to pass appropriate orders within the time-line indicated therein. In the instant case, neither any order pursuant to Inder 4 Singh Bhardwaj has been placed on record, nor there is any challenge thereto. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, in accordance with law. 3.
Granting such liberty, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge th 30 October, 2025(rohit) CWPOA NO. 3523/2019 decided on 28. 04. 2023 CWPOA No. 3145/2019 decided a/w connected matters on 24. 03. 2022
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.