HUIDROM KESHO SINGH v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 2 OTHERS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2020-12-22. HUIDROM KESHO SINGH v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 2 OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item No. 7 (Through video conferencing) IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 675 of 2020 Huidrom Kesho Singh …. Petitioner/s - Versus – State of Manipur & 2 Ors. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 22. 12. 2020 Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also heard Mr. Lenin Hijam, learned Addl. AG appearing for all the respondents No. 1, 2 & 3. At the outset, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition can be disposed of by directing the respondent No. 2 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 20. 12. 2019 submitted by the petitioner by issuing a speaking order. Mr. Lenin Hijam, learned Addl. AG submitted that he has no objection in granting such prayer provided that the said representation be considered and disposed of in terms of the relevant rules. In view of the submissions made above, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No.
2 to consider and dispose of the said representation dated 20. 12. 2019 submitted by the petitioner to the Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Manipur, Lamphelpat in terms of the relevant rules by issuing a speaking order within a period of 6(six) weeks from the date of WP(C) No. 675 of 2020 Page 1 receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to submit a copy of this order along with a copy of the said representation dated 20. 12. 2019 to the respondent No. 2 within a period of 1(one) week from today. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. A copy of this order be furnished to both the counsel appearing for the parties through their respective whatsapp/e-mail. JUDGE Lhaineichong WP(C) No. 675 of 2020 Page 2
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.