/11008/2024 of PRAVEEN KUMAR TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ADDL. FINCANCE GOVT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
Court: Allahabad High Court
Bench: ALOK MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Allahabad High Court judgment dated 2024-11-22. /11008/2024 of PRAVEEN KUMAR TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ADDL. FINCANCE GOVT. LKO AND 3...
Judgment text
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:77327 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11008 of 2024 Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Fincance Govt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Tiwari,Satya Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C. S. C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri S. P. Mishra, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner is working on the post of Additional Commissioner (Finance), Board of Revenue, Lucknow and is fully eligible and entitled for next higher Grade Pay of Rs. 8900/-. 3. It has been submitted that the petitioner was subjected to disciplinary proceeding after which an order of punishment dated 01. 06. 2021 was passed against the petitioner which was assailed by him before the U. P. State Public Service Commission in Claim Petiton No.
1243/2021 where the State Public Service Commission has set aside the punishment order by means of order dated 25. 07. 2023 and despite the judgment having been passed by the U. P. Public Service Commission, the respondents are not considering him for grant of the higher grade pay. 5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 1 shall be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in a time bound matter. 4. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 1 to decide the representations of the petitioner dated 27. 07. 2023 and 21. 12. 2023 (Annexure No.
1) expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J. ) Order Date :- 22. 11. 2024/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: Allahabad High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.