AMANDEEP KAUR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2025-08-21. AMANDEEP KAUR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 105 CRWP-9021-2025 Date of Decision: 21. 08. 2025 AMANDEEP KAUR ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL **** Present: Mr. G. P. S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, J. (ORAL) A writ petition has been filed by petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeking direction to official respondents to protect her life and liberty. Respondents No. 2 and 3 are also sought to be directed to look into representation dated 14. 06. 2025 (Annexure P-2) submitted by the petitioner, in a time bound manner. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to respondent No. 3- Superintendent of Police, District Karnal, to consider and decide representation dated 14. 06.
2025 (Annexure P-2) moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner. Notice of motion to official respondents only. CRWP-9021-2025 -2- Mr. Vishal Kashyap, Sr. DAG Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that the needful shall be done in due course. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3- Superintendent of Police, District Karnal, to decide the aforesaid representation dated 14. 06. 2025 (Annexure P-2) submitted by petitioner within a period of one month from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and take necessary action, if so required. However, if, respondent No. 3 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation (Annexure P-2), the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) AUGUST 21, 2025.
JUDGE Ajay Goswami Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.