VISHNU BORMON@VISHNU MALIK v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE W. DIENGDOH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. BHATTACHARJEE
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-03-25. VISHNU BORMON@VISHNU MALIK v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 04 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. M. C. No. 26 of 2026 Date of Decision: 25. 03. 2026 Shri. Visnu Bormon @ Vishnu Malik Son of (L) Torun Borman, R/o Pahansyiem Village, Nongpoh Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. Presently serving sentence in District Prison & Correctional Home, Nongpoh ……….. Applicant/Petitioner -Vs- State of Meghalaya (Through the Public Prosecutor) ………… Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. R. H. Alice, Legal Aid Counsel. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Gurung, GA. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc. : ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No Per W. Diengdoh, (J): JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Heard Mr. R. H. Alice, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal before this Court against the impugned judgment dated 13. 12.
2023 and related order of sentence dated 21. 12. 2023 passed by the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh in POCSO Case No. 22 of 2015 under Section 6/7 of the POCSO Act and under Section 376(2)(i) IPC. 2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 753 days has occurred, due to circumstances which is beyond the control of the applicant, since he belongs to a poor family with no means to engage a private counsel, as such, he could not prefer an appeal within the statutory period. Thus, legal aid was sought for, and accordingly, this application was processed through Legal Aid Counsel. It is therefore prayed that the delay be condoned and the appeal be admitted. 3. Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA appearing for the State respondent has no objection to the prayer for condonation of the delay. 4. On consideration of the submission made, we are persuaded to allow this application on being satisfied that the grounds cited for the delay contain sufficient cause.
Accordingly, the delay of 753 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned. 5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after 1(one) week. 6. Misc. Case disposed of. (B. Bhattacharjee) (W. Diengdoh) Judge Judge Signature Not Verified 3 Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026. 03. 25 18:14:52 IST
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.