AJAY DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-05-06. AJAY DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2236 of 2026 ---- Ajay Das, aged about 28 years, S/o Nishikant Das, R/o Mukhiya Danga Deoghat, PO – Bhilai Pahari, PS – MGM Dimna, District – East Singhbhum .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate :- Mr. Ravikant Sandilya, Advocate :- Mr. Praveen Shankar Pd. Advocate :- Mr. Dhananjay Narayan Deo, Advocate For the State :- Kumari Rashmi, Advocate ---- 02/06. 05. 2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with M. G. M. (Mango Muffasil) P. S. Case No.
180 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118, 352, 351(2), 190, 191(2), 192(3), 109 and 303(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, st 2023 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1 Class, Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegations of assault are there, however, that allegation is not there against the petitioner and only it has been alleged that the petitioner has asked to take vehicle in a parking place. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No. 17 of the petition. --1-- A. B. A. No. 2236 of 2026 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that allegation of assault are there. 5. On query made by the Court, learned counsel appearing for the State fairly submits that allegation of assault is not there so far petitioner is concerned. 5.
Looking into the contents of the FIR it transpires that the allegation of assault is not there against the petitioner and only the petitioner has requested to take the vehicle on the parking place and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No. 17 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the st satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1 Class, Jamshedpur in connection with M. G. M. (Mango Muffasil) P. S. Case No. 180 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. ) Dated 06. 05.
2026 Sangam/ --2-- A. B. A. No. 2236 of 2026
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.