Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Smt.B.Indira Devi v. Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania, I.A.S

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-08. Smt.B.Indira Devi v. Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania, I.A.S. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

--'.. :<:! ,'. i [ 3304 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2153OF 2025 IN WP. No. 11081 OF 2025 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein for their willful and deliberate disobedience towards the Orders of the High Court dated 1 1 -04-2025 passed in W. P. No. 1 1081 OF 2025. Between: Smt. B. lndira Devi, Wo J. Sarveshwar Reddy, aged about 62 years, Rtd. G. H. M, Z. P. H. S, Kothapeta, Hanwada mandal, Mahabubnagar district. Rl/o H. No. 7-4-4011/C, Opp Sri Sathya Sai Mandir, Mahabubnagar. (PPO. No. 1 1 -020322/SP) ... PETITIONER AND Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania, l. A. S, l. low Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Dept, Govemment of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ... CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl.

P UGENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: GOW. PLEADER SERVICES'lll The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI ANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJ ESHWAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No. 2153 of 2O25 IN WRIT PETITION No,11O81OF 20:l; OSth Decemberr 2025 Between: Smt. B. Indira Devi ... Petitioner AND Sri Sandeep Kumar Sulthania . . Respondent ORDER Heard Sri P. Ugender Reddy, learned counsel tor the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-Ill, e ppearing for the respondent. 2. This Contempt Case is filed alleging violal:i >n of the order passed bythisCourtin W. P. No. 110BLof 2025, date d 11. 04. 2025. 3. Learned counsel for the respective parties inf lrmed this Court that the order passed by this Court in W. P. No. 110E 1 of 2025, dated LL. 04. 2025 has been complied with. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the Contempt Case is closed.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Contempt Case, shall stand closed. SD/. N. SRIH UTYREGI //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To, REDDYAdvocate [OPUC] 1. One CC to SRl. P UGENDER 2. TwoCCstoGPFORSERV|CESlll'HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana tourl 3. Two CD Copies TPK/PSL R- HIGH COURT DATED:08/1 212025 1 HES 6. Y 3 (1 z j R 7 26 f,r, t \ sB1Tc\. { ORDER CC. No. 2153 of 2025 IN WP. No. 11081 of 2025 CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED ;t"r C ffl"'

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.