ANIL KUMAR YADAV ALLIAS ANIL YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2025-12-22. ANIL KUMAR YADAV ALLIAS ANIL YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7394 of 2025 ---- Anil Kumar Yadav @ Anil Yadav, S/o Jugal Mahto, age 26 years, R/o village – Churi Basti, South Churi Basti, PO and PS – Khalari, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Advocate ---- 02/22. 12. 2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khalari P. S. Case No.
66 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 4 and 21 of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, Rule 54 of Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004 and under Rule 7 and 11 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining Transportation and Storage) Rule, 2017 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the owner-cum-driver of the Tractor in question and the allegations are made that 100 cft. sand was being loaded in the said tractor. He further submits that the petitioner has got no --1-- A. B. A. No. 7394 of 2025 criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No. 25 of the petition. He then submits that seizure of sand is not disclosed in the seizure list. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that illegally sand was being carried. 5.
Considering that the petitioner is the owner-cum-driver of the Tractor in question and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No. 25 of the petition and seizure of sand is not disclosed in the seizure list, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within four weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Khalari P. S. Case No. 66 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. ) Dated 22. 12. 2025 Sangam/ --2-- A. B. A. No. 7394 of 2025
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.